MENU
You use Azure Monitor to analyze Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) activity logs.
Yon receive more than 100 email alerts each day for tailed Azure Al) user sign-in attempts.
You need to ensure that a new security administrator receives the alerts instead of you.
Solution: From Azure monitor, you modify the action group.
Does this meet the goal?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium SC-300 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
CA
Carrol
12 months ago
No way, I thought you had to set up a new alert rule for that!
JE
Jettie
1 year ago
Sounds good, but what if the new admin misses the alerts?
EL
Elmira
1 year ago
Wait, can you really just change the action group like that?
HO
Honey
1 year ago
Totally agree, that's the right move!
MI
Miesha
1 year ago
Yes, modifying the action group will redirect alerts.
NA
Nan
1 year ago
I feel like this is a trick question. Changing the action group seems like it should work, but I wonder if there are other settings we need to check first.
AN
Annett
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about whether just modifying the action group is enough. Do we need to do anything else to ensure the new admin gets the alerts?
ID
Idella
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we had to change alert settings in Azure Monitor, and it involved action groups too. This feels similar, so I’m leaning towards yes.
KA
Kallie
1 year ago
I think modifying the action group is the right approach, but I'm not entirely sure if it will automatically redirect all alerts to the new admin.
MA
Margo
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. If the services are reused, that means they need to be more secure, performant, and reliable. So the demands on the infrastructure should increase, not decrease. I'll go with A.
GL
Glenn
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward SNMP question. I'll review the variable types and choose the two that are valid.
FA
Fannie
1 year ago
I might go with the comparison between locations B and C, but I'm unsure if the 50% weaker claim is valid. I should double-check those calculations.