Microsoft SC-300 Exam - Topic 6 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-300 exam

Question #: 67
Topic #: 6

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have a Microsoft 365 tenant.

You have 100 IT administrators who are organized into 10 departments.

You create the access review shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit tab.)

You discover that all access review requests are received by Megan Bowen.

You need to ensure that the manager of each department receives the access reviews of their respective department.

Solution: You modify the properties of the IT administrator user accounts.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Teri at Jan 08, 2023, 01:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jerry

10 months ago

Nope, this won't meet the goal at all.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

10 months ago

I thought access reviews were supposed to go to department heads automatically?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

10 months ago

Wait, are we sure this is the right approach?

upvoted 0 times

...

Janessa

10 months ago

Totally agree, it needs more than that!

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggy

10 months ago

Just changing user properties won't fix the routing issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

11 months ago

This seems tricky. I feel like there should be a setting for routing access reviews specifically to department heads.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like just changing properties won't redirect the access reviews to the right people.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

11 months ago

I remember a similar question where we had to assign roles to different users. Maybe that's what we need to do here too?

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

11 months ago

I think modifying user account properties might not be enough. We might need to set specific permissions for each manager.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

11 months ago

I'm pretty confident that option A is the best choice here. Restricting identities by domain is the most targeted and effective way to prevent external users from gaining permissions within the organization. The other options seem like they could be more complex or potentially leave some gaps. I'll make sure to carefully read through the question again, but I think option A is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coral

11 months ago

This is a good question to test our knowledge of the EnterpriseOne file structure. Based on my experience, I believe the xdo.cfg file is located in the \system\lib32 directory on the batch server. I'll double-check my answer, but I'm feeling confident about this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesus

11 months ago

I think Accelerators are more about one-on-one support rather than webinars or customer support. Could it be C?

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

1 year ago

I'd rather not be the guy who has to explain to Megan why she's no longer getting all the access reviews. Maybe we can just send her a fruit basket and hope she's feeling generous.

upvoted 0 times

Chanel

1 year ago

I'd rather not be the guy who has to explain to Megan why she's no longer getting all the access reviews. Maybe we can just send her a fruit basket and hope she's feeling generous.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tracey

1 year ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Hana

1 year ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Leigha

1 year ago

Ah, the age-old IT problem of who gets to see what. Modifying user accounts? That's like trying to herd cats. Let's hope the real solution is more elegant than that.

upvoted 0 times

Kris

1 year ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Staci

1 year ago

I agree, modifying user accounts seems like a messy solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

1 year ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Gertude

1 year ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

1 year ago

Nope, this doesn't meet the goal. We need a solution that involves the department managers, not the individual IT administrators. Maybe we need to look into Azure AD groups or something similar.

upvoted 0 times

...

Naomi

1 year ago

Well, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if modifying the user accounts is the best approach, but it's worth a shot. Maybe we can get creative and find a way to make this work.

upvoted 0 times

Curt

1 year ago

If it doesn't work, we can always explore other options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adrianna

1 year ago

Maybe we can try it out and see if it solves the problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anna

1 year ago

But what if there's a simpler solution we're missing?

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenn

1 year ago

I think modifying the user accounts could work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

1 year ago

Let's give it a shot and see if it solves the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desiree

1 year ago

I think we should try it out and see if it works.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harrison

1 year ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Stacey

1 year ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

1 year ago

I'm not sure, maybe we should consider other options as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

1 year ago

I agree with Emilio, modifying the properties of user accounts should work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

1 year ago

Modifying the user account properties doesn't seem like the right solution. The goal is to have each department manager receive the access reviews for their respective department, not the individual IT administrators.

upvoted 0 times