Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft SC-300 Exam - Topic 6 Question 67 Discussion

Posted by Teri on Jan 08, 2023 at 01:30 AM

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have a Microsoft 365 tenant.

You have 100 IT administrators who are organized into 10 departments.

You create the access review shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit tab.)

You discover that all access review requests are received by Megan Bowen.

You need to ensure that the manager of each department receives the access reviews of their respective department.

Solution: You modify the properties of the IT administrator user accounts.

Does this meet the goal?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium SC-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
JE
Jerry 11 months ago
Nope, this won't meet the goal at all.
LE
Lemuel 11 months ago
I thought access reviews were supposed to go to department heads automatically?
MA
Mammie 12 months ago
Wait, are we sure this is the right approach?
JA
Janessa 12 months ago
Totally agree, it needs more than that!
PE
Peggy 1 year ago
Just changing user properties won't fix the routing issue.
MA
Maryann 1 year ago
This seems tricky. I feel like there should be a setting for routing access reviews specifically to department heads.
ER
Erick 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like just changing properties won't redirect the access reviews to the right people.
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
I remember a similar question where we had to assign roles to different users. Maybe that's what we need to do here too?
ST
Stephaine 1 year ago
I think modifying user account properties might not be enough. We might need to set specific permissions for each manager.
EV
Evangelina 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that option A is the best choice here. Restricting identities by domain is the most targeted and effective way to prevent external users from gaining permissions within the organization. The other options seem like they could be more complex or potentially leave some gaps. I'll make sure to carefully read through the question again, but I think option A is the way to go.
CO
Coral 1 year ago
This is a good question to test our knowledge of the EnterpriseOne file structure. Based on my experience, I believe the xdo.cfg file is located in the \system\lib32 directory on the batch server. I'll double-check my answer, but I'm feeling confident about this.
JE
Jesus 1 year ago
I think Accelerators are more about one-on-one support rather than webinars or customer support. Could it be C?
VA
Valentine 1 year ago
I'd rather not be the guy who has to explain to Megan why she's no longer getting all the access reviews. Maybe we can just send her a fruit basket and hope she's feeling generous.
CH
Chanel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Valentine
I'd rather not be the guy who has to explain to Megan why she's no longer getting all the access reviews. Maybe we can just send her a fruit basket and hope she's feeling generous.
TR
Tracey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Valentine
B) No
HA
Hana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Valentine
A) Yes
LE
Leigha 1 year ago
Ah, the age-old IT problem of who gets to see what. Modifying user accounts? That's like trying to herd cats. Let's hope the real solution is more elegant than that.
KR
Kris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leigha
A) Yes
ST
Staci 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leigha
I agree, modifying user accounts seems like a messy solution.
TE
Tegan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leigha
B) No
GE
Gertude 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leigha
A) Yes
ER
Erick 1 year ago
Nope, this doesn't meet the goal. We need a solution that involves the department managers, not the individual IT administrators. Maybe we need to look into Azure AD groups or something similar.
NA
Naomi 1 year ago
Well, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if modifying the user accounts is the best approach, but it's worth a shot. Maybe we can get creative and find a way to make this work.
CU
Curt 1 year ago
↳ replying to Naomi
If it doesn't work, we can always explore other options.
AD
Adrianna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Naomi
Maybe we can try it out and see if it solves the problem.
AN
Anna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Naomi
But what if there's a simpler solution we're missing?
GL
Glenn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Naomi
I think modifying the user accounts could work.
JA
Janey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Naomi
Let's give it a shot and see if it solves the issue.
DE
Desiree 1 year ago
↳ replying to Naomi
I think we should try it out and see if it works.
HA
Harrison 1 year ago
↳ replying to Naomi
B) No
ST
Stacey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Naomi
A) Yes
VI
Viola 2 years ago
I'm not sure, maybe we should consider other options as well.
AL
Allene 2 years ago
I agree with Emilio, modifying the properties of user accounts should work.
CO
Cordelia 2 years ago
Modifying the user account properties doesn't seem like the right solution. The goal is to have each department manager receive the access reviews for their respective department, not the individual IT administrators.
JE
Jennie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cordelia
The goal is to have each department manager receive the access reviews for their respective department.
KR
Kristian 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cordelia
Modifying the user account properties doesn't seem like the right solution.
KA
Karan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cordelia
B) No
HE
Herschel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cordelia
A) Yes
EM
Emilio 2 years ago
I think the solution meets the goal.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel