New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft SC-300 Exam - Topic 5 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-300 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 5
[All SC-300 Questions]

You have an Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) tenant that contains the objects shown in the following table.

Which objects can you add as eligible in Azure Privileged identity Management (PIM) for an Azure AD role?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Merilyn at May 07, 2022, 10:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Magdalene
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe all three can be eligible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
4 months ago
User1 and Identity1 is a no-go, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
4 months ago
Surprised that Guest1 can be added at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
5 months ago
I think it's just User1 and Guest1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
5 months ago
User1 is definitely eligible for PIM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether Identity1 counts as a user or not. I need to recall how identities are treated in PIM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
5 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between users and guests for role assignments. I feel like User1 is definitely eligible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
5 months ago
I remember that only users can be assigned roles in PIM, but I'm not sure if guests can be included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
5 months ago
I believe that both User1 and Guest1 can be eligible, but I’m not entirely certain if that’s the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy for this. I'll start by eliminating any options that don't meet the application layer requirement, then focus on the detection and false positive aspects to narrow it down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about the primary effect of using a service virtualization tool. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. I think I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
5 months ago
The "Group custom field value" seems like it could work here. We can create a custom field that stores the group information, and then use that to control the security level.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel