Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft SC-300 Exam - Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-300 exam

Question #: 42
Topic #: 1

[All SC-300 Questions]

You need to configure the detection of multi-staged attacks to meet the monitoring requirements.

What should you do?

ACustomize the Azure Sentinel rule logic.

BCreate a workbook.

CAdd Azure Sentinel data connectors.

DAdd an Azure Sentinel playbook.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Barbra at May 05, 2022, 01:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Teri

9 months ago

Adding data connectors is crucial, C shouldn't be overlooked!

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggie

9 months ago

Wait, can you really detect multi-staged attacks just with A?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

9 months ago

Not so sure about that, B could be useful too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamal

9 months ago

Definitely agree, A seems like the best option!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jovita

9 months ago

I think customizing the Azure Sentinel rule logic is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Launa

9 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the workbooks. I thought they were more for visualization rather than detection. Is option B really relevant here?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamesha

10 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we had to set up monitoring for threats, and I feel like adding a playbook could help automate responses. Could that be option D?

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

10 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about data connectors being essential for gathering the right information. Maybe option C is the way to go?

upvoted 0 times

...

Celeste

10 months ago

I think customizing the Azure Sentinel rule logic could be the right approach since it allows for tailored detection of specific attack patterns.

upvoted 0 times

...

Solange

10 months ago

Okay, I remember learning about this in the course materials. I believe the correct answer is LDAP, but I'll double-check the options to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamela

10 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. Avoiding VPN and secure network channels doesn't seem like a countermeasure to me. The other options all sound like legitimate ways to monitor and prevent inappropriate usage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawn

10 months ago

Hmm, including relevant information in the subject line seems like a no-brainer. That's got to be one of the best ways to grab people's attention and get them to open the email.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catina

10 months ago

I've got a good handle on this. The best approach is to use the Global Party ID from Customer 360 Data Manager as the primary key, and then sync that across all three systems. That way, you have a single source of truth for the customer data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

10 months ago

The key is to use the custom date format option and modify the format code to display the date as "2020 January 01". I've done this before, so I'm confident I can handle it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnta

10 months ago

I think we might need WS-PolicyAttachment for centralizing the security policies, but I'm not entirely sure how it connects to the service contracts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Floyd

10 months ago

Alright, time to put my C++ knowledge to the test. Let me carefully analyze the code and the stack operations to determine the correct output.

upvoted 0 times

...

Udara Somachandra

5 years ago

Answer C "In order to enable these Fusion-powered attack detection scenarios, any data sources listed must be ingested using the associated Azure Sentinel data connectors." https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sentinel/fusion#attack-detection-scenarios

upvoted 1 times

...