Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft SC-200 Exam - Topic 3 Question 40 Discussion

You have a Microsoft Sentinel workspace that contains the following incident.Brute force attack against Azure Portal analytics rule has been triggered.You need to identify the geolocation information that corresponds to the incident.What should you do?
A) From Overview, review the Potential malicious events map.
B) From Incidents, review the details of the iPCustomEntity entity associated with the incident.
C) From Incidents, review the details of the AccouncCuscomEntity entity associated with the incident.
D) From Investigation, review insights on the incident entity.

Microsoft SC-200 Exam - Topic 3 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-200 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 3
[All SC-200 Questions]

You have a Microsoft Sentinel workspace that contains the following incident.

Brute force attack against Azure Portal analytics rule has been triggered.

You need to identify the geolocation information that corresponds to the incident.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Potential malicious events: When traffic is detected from sources that are known to be malicious, Microsoft Sentinel alerts you on the map. If you see orange, it is inbound traffic: someone is trying to access your organization from a known malicious IP address. If you see Outbound (red) activity, it means that data from your network is being streamed out of your organization to a known malicious IP address.


by Rickie at Aug 04, 2022, 07:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Pedro
10 months ago
Totally agree with B, that's where the details are!
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
10 months ago
Wait, can you really get geolocation from B? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
10 months ago
A seems like a quick way to see potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
10 months ago
I think D might be better for insights overall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
10 months ago
Option B is the way to go for geolocation info.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the AccouncCuscomEntity; I don’t recall it being relevant for geolocation, but maybe I’m missing something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D, but I feel like I need to double-check what insights we can actually get from the incident entity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
11 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think the Potential malicious events map could show us the geolocation information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
11 months ago
I think we might need to check the iPCustomEntity for geolocation details, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
11 months ago
I think the transparency principle is most directly related to the right to be informed. The transparency principle is about ensuring that individuals are aware of how their personal data is being used, so the right to be informed seems like the most relevant option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
11 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. I know we need to ensure privacy and message integrity, but I'm not 100% sure which pattern would be the best fit. I'll review the concepts and try to narrow it down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
11 months ago
I feel like there was a practice question that mentioned this. Was it saying we can address controls even if fraud isn't found?
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
11 months ago
Hmm, tricky question. Need to consider the investment duration, expected returns, and matching expenses for two different marriages.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel