Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft SC-200 Exam - Topic 2 Question 77 Discussion

You have a Microsoft 365 subscription. You have the following KQL query.DeviceEvents| where ActionType == "AntivirusDetection*You need to ensure that you can create a Microsoft Defender XDR custom detection rule by using the query.What should you add to the query?
D) sumarize (ReportId)=make_set(ReportId), count() by Deviceld
A) summarize (Timestamp, DeviceHanw)=arg_min(Timestampf DeviceName), count() by Deviceld
B) sumarize (Timestamp, ReportId)>arg_max(Timestanp, Reportld), count{) by Deviceld
C) summarize (Timestamp)=range(Timestatip), count() by Deviceld

Microsoft SC-200 Exam - Topic 2 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-200 exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 2
[All SC-200 Questions]

You have a Microsoft 365 subscription. You have the following KQL query.

DeviceEvents

| where ActionType == "AntivirusDetection*

You need to ensure that you can create a Microsoft Defender XDR custom detection rule by using the query.

What should you add to the query?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Dortha at Jul 16, 2024, 03:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Graciela
10 months ago
Definitely need to summarize by DeviceId, that’s key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure this is the right approach?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
10 months ago
D seems off, not sure it fits the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
10 months ago
I think B might be better, but not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
10 months ago
Looks like option A is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, but I’m not sure if the arg_max function is what we need for this scenario. It’s tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
11 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen something like option D before, but I’m not entirely confident it’s the right choice for creating a custom detection rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
11 months ago
I think option A looks familiar, but I’m a bit confused about the syntax. Did we cover that specific format?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
11 months ago
I remember we practiced a similar KQL query in class, but I’m not sure which summarize function fits best here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
11 months ago
Ugh, I'm not super familiar with KQL queries and custom detection rules. This is going to require some careful thinking and maybe a quick review of the material. I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The key is to understand what the query is doing and how I can transform it to create a custom detection rule. I've got this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking me to modify the query, but I'm not entirely sure what the goal is. I'll need to read through it carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
11 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward KQL query question. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this. I'll need to think it through and consider the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
12 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I think the answer is B - From System and Security, select System.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
12 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about statement II, though. I remember something about basis recovery but can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 year ago
I'm just going to close my eyes and click on an answer. Hopefully, it's the right one, or at least I'll get partial credit for trying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
1 year ago
This is a tricky one! I'm going to guess option C - 'summarize (Timestamp)=range(Timestamp), count() by DeviceId'. It sounds like it could work, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
1 year ago
Wait, what's 'arg_min' and 'arg_max'? I'm a bit confused by the syntax here. Maybe I should ask the instructor for clarification.
upvoted 0 times
Linwood
1 year ago
Understanding the syntax is important for creating the custom detection rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
1 year ago
Adding arg_min or arg_max can help you refine your query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
1 year ago
Arg_min and arg_max are functions used to find the minimum and maximum values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
1 year ago
C) Adding 'summarize (Timestamp)=range(Timestamp), count() by DeviceId' will help you create the Microsoft Defender XDR custom detection rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
1 year ago
You can ask the instructor for clarification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 year ago
B) 'arg_min' and 'arg_max' are functions used to find the minimum and maximum values in a column. You can ask the instructor for clarification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
1 year ago
A) You should add 'summarize (Timestamp, DeviceName)=arg_min(Timestamp, DeviceName), count() by DeviceId' to the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tonja
1 year ago
Aha, I've seen this kind of query before! I'm going to go with option D - 'summarize (ReportId)=make_set(ReportId), count() by DeviceId'. It seems to be the most relevant for creating a custom detection rule.
upvoted 0 times
Clorinda
1 year ago
Yes, option D makes sense for adding to the query to create the custom detection rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
1 year ago
I agree, option D seems to be the most suitable for creating the custom detection rule with Microsoft Defender XDR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
1 year ago
I think option D is the right choice too. It looks like it will help create the custom detection rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thomasena
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I think I need to read up more on Microsoft Defender XDR custom detection rules. This query looks a bit complex.
upvoted 0 times
Detra
1 year ago
User1: Let's try adding it and see if it works for the custom detection rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
1 year ago
User3: I agree. Adding that to the query will ensure the rule is effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
1 year ago
User2: That makes sense. It will help create the Microsoft Defender XDR custom detection rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
1 year ago
User1: I think you should add 'summarize (Timestamp)=range(Timestamp), count() by DeviceId' to the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valene
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) summarize (ReportId)=make_set(ReportId), count() by DeviceId could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
1 year ago
I agree with Trinidad. Adding range(Timestamp) will help create the custom detection rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C) summarize (Timestamp)=range(Timestamp), count() by DeviceId.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel