Microsoft Exam SC-200 Topic 2 Question 63 Discussion

I don't know, I'm kind of torn on this one. Sure, the exclusion group seems like the easiest option, but what if we need to keep an eye on Server1 for some reason? Upgrading to Defender for Servers Plan 2 might give us more granular control over the scanning, you know? Either way, it's going to be a balancing act between security and convenience.

Ah, the age-old question of how to avoid the watchful eye of the security team. But in all seriousness, I think you guys are on the right track. Creating an exclusion group is the way to go here. It's like having a secret clubhouse for your servers - they can hang out there, away from the prying eyes of the scanners.

I agree, option D does seem like the most logical choice here. It's like creating a VIP list for your servers - the ones that don't need to be scanned can just hang out in the exclusion group and avoid the paparazzi. Plus, it's probably easier to manage than creating a bunch of individual exclusion tags or rules.

Hmm, this is an interesting one. Agentless scanning - that means the servers are being monitored without any software installed on them, right? So we need to find a way to exclude Server1 from this, but with minimal administrative effort. I'm thinking option D - creating an exclusion group - might be the way to go. That way, we can easily add or remove servers from the exclusion without having to configure each one individually.