Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft SC-200 Exam - Topic 2 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-200 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 2
[All SC-200 Questions]

You have a Microsoft 365 subscription that uses Microsoft Defender XDR. You need to implement deception rules. The solution must ensure that you can limit the scope of the rules.

What should you create first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A workbook is a data-driven interactive report in Microsoft Sentinel. You can use workbooks to create custom reports based on data from your Azure subscription. Reference: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sentinel/workbooks-overview


by Trinidad at Oct 07, 2023, 01:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Joana
4 months ago
Seems a bit confusing, why not just use sensitive entity tags?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
4 months ago
I thought device tags were more important for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
4 months ago
Wait, are honeytoken entity tags not the first step?
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
4 months ago
Totally agree, device groups are essential for limiting scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
5 months ago
You need to create device groups first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
5 months ago
Sensitive entity tags could be important, but I feel like we need to establish the device groups first to manage everything properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
5 months ago
Honeytoken entity tags sound familiar, but I can't recall if they are the first thing to create.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
5 months ago
I remember practicing with device tags in a similar question, but I'm not confident if that's the right first step here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
5 months ago
I think we might need to start with device groups to limit the scope effectively, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
5 months ago
I'd start by creating device tags. That way, I can apply specific tags to the devices I want to include in the deception rules, and easily manage the scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between device groups and device tags. Which one would be the best option to create first for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
5 months ago
Device groups, for sure. That's the way to go to limit the scope of the deception rules. I'm confident that's the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is to create the appropriate grouping or tagging mechanism first, before setting up the deception rules. Device groups or tags seem like the logical starting point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
6 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the scope of the deception rules and how to limit them effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the purpose of Gap Analysis. I'll review the options carefully and choose the one that best matches the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Good teamwork leads to better overall quality of service, as people with different skills and expertise can collaborate effectively. I'll make sure to emphasize that in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
6 months ago
I remember learning about the Azure Cosmos DB Table API having some advantages around scalability and availability, so I'll try to recall those details and explain how they compare to Azure Table storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
6 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. Since the question specifically mentions Windows 10 computers, I'm thinking Microsoft Endpoint Manager or Configuration Manager would be the way to go. They both have the capabilities to deploy the OS, join to AD, and manage updates across the different network setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
10 months ago
The answer is clearly B - device tags. I mean, come on, who doesn't love a good tagging party? Just be careful you don't end up with a bunch of 'Device: Sneaky Hacker' tags, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
10 months ago
Device groups, device tags, honeytoken entity tags... They're all like a buffet of deception options. But I think D is the way to go. Sensitive entity tags will really add that extra layer of spice to your traps. Just don't want anyone to get too 'sensitive' about it, if you know what I mean.
upvoted 0 times
Carin
9 months ago
Absolutely, sensitive entity tags will definitely make the deception rules more effective in Microsoft Defender XDR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
9 months ago
I think it's important to have that extra level of protection, especially when it comes to deception tactics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
9 months ago
Yeah, they will definitely help in limiting the scope of the rules and adding an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
10 months ago
I agree, sensitive entity tags seem like the best choice for implementing deception rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
10 months ago
C, all the way! Honeytoken entity tags are where it's at. I bet you can make some real juicy lures with those. Just don't let the bad guys get too sticky-fingered, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
10 months ago
Ah, gotta go with B on this one. Device tags are the way to go. You can get super specific with your deception traps that way. Although, I do wonder if they have a 'honey-flavored' option.
upvoted 0 times
Phuong
9 months ago
I'm not sure about a 'honey-flavored' option, but device tags will help limit the scope of the rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
9 months ago
Yeah, device tags allow for more specific and targeted deception traps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
10 months ago
I agree, device tags are definitely the way to go for implementing deception rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lilli
11 months ago
Hmm, device groups seem like the logical choice here. I mean, how else are you going to limit the scope of those deception rules? It's like trying to catch a fly with a baseball bat.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
10 months ago
I think honeytoken entity tags could be a good option for creating deception rules as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
10 months ago
Yeah, device tags could also be useful for organizing and managing devices in the subscription.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
10 months ago
I agree, device groups would definitely help in limiting the scope of the deception rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
My
11 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe we should consider device tags as well to better organize the devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
11 months ago
I agree with Jaclyn, honeytoken entity tags would help limit the scope of the deception rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
11 months ago
I think we should create honeytoken entity tags first.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel