New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft SC-200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-200 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 1
[All SC-200 Questions]

You have an Azure subscription that uses Microsoft Defender XDR.

From the Microsoft Defender portal, you perform an audit search and export the results as a file named Filel.csv that contains 10,000 rows.

You use Microsoft Excel to perform Get & Transform Data operations to parse the AuditData column from Filel.csv. The operations fail to generate columns for specific JSON properties.

You need to ensure that Excel generates columns for the specific JSON properties in the audit search results.

Solution: From Defender, you modify the search criteria of the audit search to reduce the number of returned records, and then you export the results. From Excel, you perform the Get & Transform Data operations by using the new export.

Does this meet the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Dannie
3 months ago
Not sure if that’s enough to fix the JSON issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
3 months ago
I think it’s a solid approach, yes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
3 months ago
Reducing records should help with parsing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
3 months ago
Definitely meets the requirement, I agree!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
3 months ago
Wait, can you really fix it just by reducing records?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
4 months ago
I believe that reducing the number of records should help, but I’m not confident it’s a complete solution for the JSON parsing issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
4 months ago
I feel like modifying the search criteria could help, but I wonder if the issue is more about how Excel handles JSON rather than just the number of records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where limiting the data helped, but I can't recall if it was specifically about JSON properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
I remember something about reducing the dataset size helping with parsing issues, but I'm not sure if it guarantees the JSON properties will be extracted correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
5 months ago
This is a good reminder to always test the data export and transformation process before the exam. I'll make sure I have a solid plan for handling large datasets like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
5 months ago
The solution seems straightforward enough. I'll give it a try and see if I can get the Excel operations to work as expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the JSON properties in the audit search results. I'll need to review the documentation to understand how to properly extract that information in Excel.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
5 months ago
Reducing the number of records returned seems like a good strategy to avoid the Excel parsing issues. I'll make sure to double-check the search criteria before exporting the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the steps to make sure I understand the problem and the proposed solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
11 months ago
I'm going to go with 'Yes' on this one. Limiting the data seems like a reasonable workaround, and the question didn't specify that we had to use the full 10,000 rows. Gotta work smart, not just hard!
upvoted 0 times
Kayleigh
10 months ago
User2: Agreed, limiting the data makes sense
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
10 months ago
User1: Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Norah
11 months ago
Ah, the age-old battle between data volume and data processing power. I wonder if the exam will provide a spreadsheet with the data already pre-processed...that would be cheating, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
11 months ago
Well, if it works, it works! Sometimes the simple solutions are the best. I just hope the exam doesn't have a trick question hidden in there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
11 months ago
I'm not sure that's the best approach. Shouldn't we be focusing on improving the Excel operations instead of limiting the data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
11 months ago
I agree with Shenika. Using Power Query in Excel is the way to go to generate columns for specific JSON properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
11 months ago
I believe the correct solution is to use Power Query in Excel to parse the JSON properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
11 months ago
This solution seems reasonable. Reducing the number of records should make it easier for Excel to handle the JSON data.
upvoted 0 times
Shalon
10 months ago
Barney: Definitely. It's all about optimizing the process for better results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
10 months ago
User 2: I agree. It's a good idea to reduce the number of records to make it more manageable for Excel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
11 months ago
User 1: Yes, that should work. Excel might have been overwhelmed with the large number of records before.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tracey
12 months ago
I agree with you, Bernardo. Modifying the search criteria won't help generate columns for specific JSON properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
12 months ago
I think the solution provided in the question is not correct.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel