Microsoft SC-100 Exam - Topic 10 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-100 exam

Question #: 30
Topic #: 10

You have an Azure subscription. The subscription contains 50 virtual machines that run Windows Server and 50 virtual machines that run Linux. You need to perform vulnerability assessments on the virtual machines. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* Identify missing updates and insecure configurations.

* Use the Qualys engine.

What should you use?

AMicrosoft Defender for Servers

BMicrosoft Defender Threat Intelligence (Defender Tl)

CMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint

DMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management (Defender EASM)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Cordelia at Oct 18, 2023, 07:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

An

4 months ago

No way, I thought Defender EASM was the answer!

upvoted 0 times

...

Hollis

4 months ago

Wait, does it really use the Qualys engine? That’s surprising!

upvoted 0 times

...

Janine

4 months ago

I agree, Defender for Servers is the best fit here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clement

5 months ago

I think Defender for Endpoint could work too, but not sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

5 months ago

Definitely go with Microsoft Defender for Servers!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

5 months ago

I vaguely recall that Microsoft Defender for Servers is designed for this kind of task, especially for both Windows and Linux VMs. It seems like the most fitting option given the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephania

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the differences between Defender for Servers and Defender for Endpoint. I thought both could handle vulnerabilities, but I'm not sure which one is tied to Qualys.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cory

5 months ago

I think I came across a similar question where we had to identify the right Defender service for vulnerability management. I feel like Defender for Servers is the right choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerlene

5 months ago

I remember studying about Microsoft Defender for Servers and its capabilities for vulnerability assessments, but I'm not entirely sure if it specifically uses the Qualys engine.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meghann

5 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'm not super familiar with the different Microsoft Defender products, so I'll need to do some research to figure out which one meets the requirements. The Qualys engine mention is a good clue, but I want to make sure I understand the capabilities of each solution before selecting an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisandra

5 months ago

Okay, I've got a strategy here. The question is asking for a solution that can identify missing updates and insecure configurations, and it specifically mentions the Qualys engine. Based on that, I think the answer is Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, since it integrates with Qualys for vulnerability assessments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amalia

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few different Microsoft Defender options, and I'm not sure which one specifically uses the Qualys engine. I'll need to review the details of each solution to determine the best fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louisa

6 months ago

This looks like a straightforward question about vulnerability assessment tools in Azure. I think the key is identifying the tool that uses the Qualys engine, which is a well-known vulnerability scanning solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karima

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know the order of operations is important, but I'm not sure if a mnemonic is the best way to approach this. Maybe I should consider the other options as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

France

6 months ago

I think the answer is B. The ip -6 add addr command looks like the right way to add a static IPv6 address to the eth0 interface.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fanny

6 months ago

I'm a bit confused. Wouldn't Cisco UCM be for call management instead of user creation?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

6 months ago

Okay, I've got it! The first line of defense is responsible for implementing the processes to actually detect and deter fraud, so I'm going to go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ceola

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The model law mentions a "rate spread" but I'm not totally clear on how that translates to the maximum rate. I'll have to re-read the question a few times to make sure I understand the concept.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerrie

2 years ago

Totally, Microsoft Defender for Servers is the way to go. I mean, it's like the Avengers of Azure security tools - it can handle both Windows and Linux, and it's got the Qualys engine on speed dial. The other options are more like the B-team, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernestine

2 years ago

I agree with Francine. Microsoft Defender for Servers is the logical choice. It's the only option that meets all the requirements - identifying missing updates and insecure configs, and using the Qualys engine. The other choices just don't seem to fit the bill.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francine

2 years ago

Hmm, I think option A, Microsoft Defender for Servers, is the way to go here. It's designed specifically for cloud workloads like VMs, and it integrates with the Qualys vulnerability assessment engine. The other options don't seem to have that specific integration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

2 years ago

I'm not sure about this one. The question is asking for a solution that can identify missing updates and insecure configurations on both Windows and Linux VMs, and it has to use the Qualys engine. From the options, it seems like Microsoft Defender for Servers might be the best fit, but I'm not confident about that.

upvoted 0 times

...