Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft SC-100 Exam - Topic 1 Question 52 Discussion

You are evaluating an Azure environment for compliance.You need to design an Azure Policy implementation that can be used to evaluate compliance without changing any resources.Which effect should you use in Azure Policy?
A) Deny
B) Disabled
C) Modify
D) Append

Microsoft SC-100 Exam - Topic 1 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-100 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 1
[All SC-100 Questions]

You are evaluating an Azure environment for compliance.

You need to design an Azure Policy implementation that can be used to evaluate compliance without changing any resources.

Which effect should you use in Azure Policy?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Reena at Sep 18, 2024, 06:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Stephaine
6 months ago
"Modify" doesn't fit here, right? Just checking!
upvoted 0 times
...
Anna
6 months ago
I thought "Deny" was the only option for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
7 months ago
Wait, can we really evaluate without changing resources?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamar
7 months ago
Totally agree, "D" is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
7 months ago
You should use "D" for compliance checks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards "Disabled" too, but I wonder if there's a better option that allows for evaluation without altering anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
8 months ago
I feel like "Append" could be useful for adding rules, but it might not fit the requirement of just evaluating compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
8 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to evaluate policies. "Deny" seems like it would block resources, which isn't what we want here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
8 months ago
I think we need to use an effect that evaluates compliance without making changes, so maybe "Disabled"? But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
8 months ago
I've got a strategy for this. Since we want to evaluate compliance without making changes, the "Modify" effect is probably not the right choice. I'm leaning towards either "Disabled" or "Append" as the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. What exactly does it mean to "evaluate compliance without changing any resources"? I'll need to think about that a bit more before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Since we need to evaluate compliance without changing anything, I'm guessing the "Deny" effect wouldn't work, as that would actually block changes. Maybe "Disabled" or "Append" could be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Azure Policy has different effects, but I'm not sure which one would be best for evaluating compliance without changing resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Azure Policy effects. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
1 year ago
Wait, are we sure 'Avada Kedavra' isn't an option? That would really ensure compliance, no questions asked!
upvoted 0 times
Audrie
12 months ago
C) Modify
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
12 months ago
B) Disabled
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
12 months ago
A) Deny
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
1 year ago
C) Modify
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
1 year ago
B) Disabled
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
1 year ago
A) Deny
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Santos
1 year ago
'Append'? That's it, I'm appending my resignation letter if this is the right answer. I'm not about to let Azure Policy play Tetris with my resources!
upvoted 0 times
Miesha
12 months ago
User 4: Append
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
1 year ago
User 3: Modify
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
1 year ago
User 2: Disabled
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
1 year ago
User 1: Deny
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verdell
1 year ago
Ooh, 'Modify'? I can just see myself trying to rewrite the entire Azure Policy on the fly. Sounds like a recipe for a disaster smoothie.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
1 year ago
Aha! 'Disabled' seems like the way to go - it's like putting the policy on a permanent coffee break, no fuss, no muss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
1 year ago
Hmm, 'Deny' sounds a bit too harsh, don't you think? I don't want to anger the Azure gods and get my whole environment shut down!
upvoted 0 times
Alba
1 year ago
Yeah, 'Disabled' seems like a safer choice. We don't want to risk disrupting our environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
1 year ago
I agree, 'Deny' does sound a bit extreme. Maybe 'Disabled' would be a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micaela
1 year ago
But 'Deny' would prevent non-compliant resources from being created in the first place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe 'Disabled' would be a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 year ago
I think we should use 'Deny' in Azure Policy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel