Microsoft PL-600 Exam - Topic 1 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-600 exam

Question #: 83
Topic #: 1

A local bank uses Microsoft Power Platform apps to store customer data.

The bank IT director discovers that all employees can see the social security numbers of their customers. The IT team does not understand how field-level security works and needs help with the design.

You need to recommend a solution to the bank that meets the following requirements:

* The system must restrict access to customer social security numbers to the vice president of finance only.

* The vice president of finance must be able to read and update customer social security numbers.

Which two actions should you recommend? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOT: Each correct selection is worth one point

ASet the values for the read permission and for the update permission for social security number to yet

BEnable field-level security for the member table.

CCreate a held-level security profile.

DEnable field-level security for the social security number column.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B, D

Field-level security is managed by the security profiles. To implement field-level security, a system administrator performs the following tasks.

Enable field security on one or more fields for a given entity.

Associate one more existing security profiles, or create one or more new security profiles to grant the appropriate access to specific users or teams.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-platform/admin/field-level-security

by Arlie at May 03, 2025, 08:50 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-600 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Simona

2 months ago

Wait, can they really just see all that info? Sounds risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deandrea

2 months ago

Agreed, that's a must!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kirk

2 months ago

Definitely need to enable field-level security for the social security number column.

upvoted 0 times

...

Holley

3 months ago

Setting read and update permissions is crucial too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

3 months ago

Not sure about creating a held-level security profile, seems unnecessary.

upvoted 0 times

...

Inocencia

3 months ago

I’m leaning towards option B for enabling field-level security for the member table, but I’m not sure if that’s enough on its own.

upvoted 0 times

...

Osvaldo

3 months ago

I’m a bit confused about whether we need to create a security profile or just set permissions directly. I feel like we discussed this in class.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dulce

4 months ago

I think enabling field-level security for the social security number column is definitely part of the solution. It sounds familiar from our practice questions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashaunda

4 months ago

I remember something about field-level security, but I'm not entirely sure how to apply it here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyman

4 months ago

This seems straightforward. We just need to enable field-level security on the social security number column and set the read and update permissions for the VP of Finance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abel

4 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the difference between field-level and role-level security. I'll need to review the documentation to make sure I recommend the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

4 months ago

I've dealt with similar issues before. I think the key is to enable field-level security on the social security number column and then set the appropriate permissions for the VP of Finance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kate

5 months ago

Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. I'm pretty sure we need to enable field-level security and create a security profile to restrict access to the social security number field.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paz

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to really understand how field-level security works in the Power Platform to solve this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

8 months ago

This question is about as clear as mud. But I'm going to have to go with B and D. Can't have those social security numbers floating around the office, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherly

8 months ago

Option A? Really? Are they trying to give the entire bank access to the social security numbers? That's a recipe for disaster! B and D, all the way.

upvoted 0 times

Aleisha

8 months ago

D) Enable field-level security for the social security number column.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

8 months ago

B) Enable field-level security for the member table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

8 months ago

This is a no-brainer! B and D, all the way. If I was the bank's IT director, I'd be living in fear of a data breach if I didn't lock down those social security numbers. Yikes!

upvoted 0 times

Kendra

7 months ago

I agree, the bank needs to prioritize data security to avoid any potential breaches.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelina

8 months ago

Absolutely, those are the correct actions to take. It's crucial to protect sensitive customer data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Precious

8 months ago

D) Enable field-level security for the social security number column.

upvoted 0 times

...

Garry

8 months ago

B) Enable field-level security for the member table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mike

9 months ago

Creating a field-level security profile could also help in ensuring the right access controls are in place.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolande

9 months ago

We also need to set the values for the read and update permissions for social security number to yet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andra

9 months ago

Hmm, I'd say A and C are the way to go. Why overcomplicate things with field-level security when you can just set the permissions directly? Gotta keep it simple, right?

upvoted 0 times