Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 8 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 8
[All PL-400 Questions]

A travel company plans to track the address of places their clients visit in an entity named Destination. Client

information is captured as contact records. Client records include links to the places that clients visit.

The company must be able to link multiple rating records to the new address record.

You find a custom Rating entity that is incomplete.

You need to expand the Rating entity to include contact, address, and rating information in one place.

Which three actions should you perform? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Glenna
11 days ago
Yes, that makes sense. It will help us link multiple rating records to the new address record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
16 days ago
I think we also need to create a 1:N relationship between the Address system entity and the Rating entity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
19 days ago
I agree with Glenna. That sounds like a good first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
25 days ago
I've got it! The answer is C, D, and F. We need to create a direct link between Address and Rating to capture the location information. And don't forget the Contact-Rating relationship. This is going to be a breeze!
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
28 days ago
I'm feeling a bit lost here. Is there a 'none of the above' option? Seriously, what kind of travel company doesn't have a central 'Destination' entity? I'm just going to guess B, D, and F and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
7 days ago
I agree, those actions seem to make sense for expanding the Rating entity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
15 days ago
I think B, D, and F are the correct actions to perform.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brunilda
30 days ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with B, D, and E. Why bother with the Destination entity when we can just map the Rating directly to the Contact and Address?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
1 months ago
Hold up, why do we need to create a relationship between Contact and Address? Isn't the Destination entity supposed to link the two? I'm going with B, C, and F.
upvoted 0 times
Myra
21 days ago
Yeah, I think expanding the Rating entity to include all necessary information is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
22 days ago
Creating a relationship between Address and Rating also seems important for tracking.
upvoted 1 times
...
Lorenza
23 days ago
I agree, it makes sense to have that connection in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
24 days ago
I think we need to create a relationship between Contact and Address to link them together.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ulysses
1 months ago
I think the correct answer is B, D, and F. Creating the relationships between Contact-Rating and Destination-Rating will allow us to link the client information with the rating records.
upvoted 0 times
Ruth
7 days ago
It's important to have those relationships set up for easy access to the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
22 days ago
I agree, those actions will help consolidate the information in one place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
26 days ago
Creating the relationships between Contact-Rating and Destination-Rating will allow us to link the client information with the rating records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
1 months ago
I think the correct answer is B, D, and F.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenna
1 months ago
I think we should create a 1:N relationship between the Contact system entity and the Address system entity named Destination.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel