Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft PL-300 Exam - Topic 5 Question 18 Discussion

Posted by Brett on Dec 07, 2022 at 09:23 PM

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have a Power BI report that imports a date table and a sales table from an Azure SQL database data source. The sales table has the following date foreign keys:

Due Date

Order Date

Delivery Date

You need to support the analysis of sales over time based on all the date foreign keys.

Solution: From Power Query Editor, you rename the date query as Due Date. You reference the Due Date query twice to make the queries for Order Date and

Delivery Date.

Does this meet the goal?

Suggested Answer: A

Creating two additional tables in Power Query can be a possible solution:

Remove any inactive relationships.

Consider renaming the role-playing dimension-type table to better describe its role. In the example, the Airport table is related to the ArrivalAirport column of the Flight table, so it's renamed as Arrival Airport.

Create a copy of the role-playing table, providing it with a name that reflects its role. If it's an Import table, we recommend defining a calculated table. If it's a DirectQuery table, you can duplicate the Power Query query.

In the example, the Departure Airport table was created by using the following calculated table definition.


Get Premium PL-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
ST
Stefania 11 months ago
Wait, is it really that simple? Sounds off.
MA
Matthew 11 months ago
No way, this doesn't meet the goal at all.
AL
Alyce 12 months ago
I thought you could use multiple references like that?
LA
Laurel 12 months ago
Totally agree, it won't work for all dates.
GO
Golda 1 year ago
This method only references one date.
LA
Laticia 1 year ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought using the same query could simplify things, but now I’m questioning if it really meets the goal.
MA
Mari 1 year ago
I remember discussing how each date field should be treated independently for accurate time-based analysis. So, I’m leaning towards "No" on this one.
JE
Jesus 1 year ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to ensure all date fields were properly linked. I feel like just renaming might not be enough.
LU
Luis 1 year ago
I think referencing the Due Date query for Order Date and Delivery Date could work, but I'm not entirely sure if it captures all the relationships needed for analysis.
AD
Adelle 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The table shows different types of resources, but I'm not sure how they all relate to rotation policies. I'll need to review the Azure Key Vault documentation to make sure I understand the capabilities of each resource type.
GI
Gianna 1 year ago
I'm confident that the answer is C. Enabling MPLS LDP on the interface is the logical next step to enable LDP after the initial configuration.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel