Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft PL-300 Exam - Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Posted by Fatima on Mar 18, 2024 at 01:11 AM

You need to create a relationship between the Weekly_Returns table and the Date table to meet the reporting requirements of the regional managers. What should you do?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium PL-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
CA
Caprice 11 months ago
Wait, can a calculated column really handle that? Seems risky.
KA
Katlyn 11 months ago
Totally agree with A, it keeps things straightforward!
SH
Sherita 11 months ago
C sounds complicated, why create a new table?
KE
Kenda 12 months ago
I think B might be better, related DAX functions can simplify things.
CH
Chun 12 months ago
A is the way to go, calculated columns are super useful!
KA
Kaitlyn 1 year ago
I feel like option A is the most straightforward solution, but I wonder if there are any performance issues with calculated columns.
LE
Lennie 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to link tables using DAX functions, but I can't recall if option B is the right approach here.
RE
Rene 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about option C; creating a new table sounds complicated. I remember something about many-to-many relationships being tricky.
BE
Bev 1 year ago
I think option A makes sense since creating a calculated column for date-id could help establish a direct relationship with the Date table.
JU
Julio 1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward to me. I'd go with option A - it's the most direct way to connect the two tables and meet the requirements. I'm confident that's the right approach here.
FR
France 1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll create the calculated date-id column in Weekly_Returns, then use that to establish the relationship to the Date table. That should give me the reporting capabilities the managers need.
VE
Verlene 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Do we need to create a new table or can we just use the existing Date table? I'm not sure which option is the best approach here.
JO
Josefa 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I think I'll go with option A - creating a calculated column in the Weekly_Returns table to use as a date ID. That seems like the most straightforward approach.
EU
Eulah 1 year ago
Responsive design is definitely the way to go here. It's the industry standard for making websites that work well across a variety of devices and screen sizes.
MA
Maryln 1 year ago
I'm hesitating between core service logic and redundantly deployed services; both seem plausible based on what we reviewed!
NA
Nan 1 year ago
PaaS sounds like the best fit to me. It should provide the platform-level services to support the custom application requirements.
HE
Hershel 1 year ago
This question reminds me of a practice one about service attributes. I think I selected similar answers but I can't recall the details.
EV
Evangelina 1 year ago
Option A is the clear winner here. Ain't nobody got time for all that extra table creating and DAX function nonsense. Keep it simple, stupid!
AZ
Azalee 1 year ago
↳ replying to Evangelina
I think we can all agree that option A is the best choice here. Let's keep it simple.
RO
Ronnie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Evangelina
Yeah, creating a new table seems like overkill. Option A is much more straightforward.
YV
Yvonne 1 year ago
↳ replying to Evangelina
I agree, option A is definitely the way to go. Simple and effective.
SH
Shaunna 1 year ago
I like the simplicity of option A. No need to reinvent the wheel here. Sometimes the obvious solution is the best one.
ST
Stephaine 2 years ago
Ooh, a many-to-many relationship, fancy! But I'm not sure it's necessary for this use case. Seems a bit overkill.
DW
Dwight 1 year ago
↳ replying to Stephaine
Yeah, a many-to-many relationship might be too complex for this scenario. Let's keep it simple.
TY
Tyisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Stephaine
C) Create a new table based on the Date table where date-id is unique, and then create a many-to-many relationship to Weekly_Return.
CH
Chana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Stephaine
A) In the Weekly_Returns table, create a new calculated column named date-id in a format of yyyymmdd and use the calculated column to create a relationship to the Date table.
LO
Lorean 2 years ago
Ugh, option B is just adding more complexity. Why bring in the Sales table when we can handle this with the Date table directly?
CH
Chanel 2 years ago
Creating a calculated column in the Weekly_Returns table is the way to go. It's a simple and straightforward solution that should get the job done.
CA
Cassie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chanel
A) In the Weekly_Returns table, create a new calculated column named date-id in a format of yyyymmdd and use the calculated column to create a relationship to the Date table.
DA
Dan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chanel
C) Create a new table based on the Date table where date-id is unique, and then create a many-to-many relationship to Weekly_Return.
PA
Paris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Chanel
A) In the Weekly_Returns table, create a new calculated column named date-id in a format of yyyymmdd and use the calculated column to create a relationship to the Date table.
BL
Blair 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think option B could also work if we use the DAX functions correctly.
HO
Hoa 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better because it allows for more flexibility in the relationship.
CA
Carri 2 years ago
I think option A is the best choice because it creates a direct relationship between the two tables.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel