Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-300 Exam - Topic 3 Question 57 Discussion

You have a Power B1 semantic model named Model 1 that runs in import storage node.You need to reduce the size of Model.Which two action should you perform? Each connect answer presents a complete solution.NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
A) Summarize the detail data. and C) Optimize the column data types.
B) Change the active relationship between table to inactive relationship.
D) Upgrade to Power BI premium.
E) Implement row-level security (RLS).

Microsoft PL-300 Exam - Topic 3 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-300 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 3
[All PL-300 Questions]

You have a Power B1 semantic model named Model 1 that runs in import storage node.

You need to reduce the size of Model.

Which two action should you perform? Each connect answer presents a complete solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Reuben at Sep 13, 2024, 02:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Eleonora
6 months ago
RLS is more about security, not size reduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
6 months ago
Wait, upgrading to Power BI premium won't reduce size, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
7 months ago
Optimizing column data types is definitely a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
7 months ago
I think changing relationships might not help with size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
7 months ago
Summarizing detail data is a solid move!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
7 months ago
Upgrading to Power BI premium seems like a big step, but I don't think it actually reduces the model size itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
8 months ago
Optimizing column data types sounds familiar; I believe it can definitely help with storage efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
8 months ago
I think changing active relationships to inactive ones might help, but I can't recall if that actually reduces the model size directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
8 months ago
I remember discussing how summarizing detail data can help reduce model size, but I'm not sure if it's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
8 months ago
Upgrading to Power BI Premium seems like overkill for this task. I think I'll focus on the more targeted options like summarizing data or optimizing data types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the "change the active relationship to inactive" option. I'm not sure how that would help reduce the model size. I'll need to research that one more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident that optimizing the column data types is a good way to go here. That should help trim down the model size without too much hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. Summarizing the detail data could help reduce the model size, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach. I'll need to think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
8 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think through the implications of each.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 years ago
E) Implement row-level security (RLS) is just weird. How's that gonna reduce the size of the model? Unless you're trying to hide the model's weight problem, I don't see that as a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
2 years ago
I'm going with B) Change the active relationship between table to inactive relationship. Inactive relationships take up less space, right? And who needs all those active relationships anyway?
upvoted 0 times
Jesusa
2 years ago
Upgrading to Power BI premium might not necessarily reduce the size of the model, so I would go with B) Change the active relationship between table to inactive relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
2 years ago
I think optimizing the column data types could also help in reducing the size of the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
2 years ago
Yes, that's correct. Inactive relationships can help reduce the size of the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gertude
2 years ago
I believe upgrading to Power BI premium might also help in reducing the size of the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
2 years ago
I agree with France. Changing the active relationship to inactive relationship could also help in reducing the size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
2 years ago
D) Upgrade to Power BI premium seems like a cheating answer. Why pay more when you can optimize the model for free?
upvoted 0 times
Alishia
2 years ago
D) Upgrade to Power BI premium seems like a cheating answer. Why pay more when you can optimize the model for free?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
2 years ago
C) Optimize the column data types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
2 years ago
A) Summarize the detail data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
France
2 years ago
I think we should optimize the column data types to reduce the size of the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 years ago
I think the correct answers are A) Summarize the detail data and C) Optimize the column data types. Reducing the size of the model can be achieved by aggregating the detailed data and optimizing the data types.
upvoted 0 times
Elvis
2 years ago
C) Optimize the column data types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
2 years ago
A) Summarize the detail data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel