Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-300 Exam - Topic 15 Question 11 Discussion

You have a Power Bl report that uses row-level security (RLS).You need to transfer RLS membership maintenance to an Azure network security team. The solution must NOT provide the Azure network security team with the ability to manage reports, datasets. or dashboards.What should you do?
B) Instruct the Azure network security team to create security groups. Configure RLS to use the groups.
A) Add the Azure network security team as members of the RLS role.
C) Configure custom instructions for the Request access feature that instructs users to contact the Azure network security team.
D) Grant the Read and Build permissions for the Power Bl datasets to the Azure network security team.

Microsoft PL-300 Exam - Topic 15 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-300 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 15
[All PL-300 Questions]

You have a Power Bl report that uses row-level security (RLS).

You need to transfer RLS membership maintenance to an Azure network security team. The solution must NOT provide the Azure network security team with the ability to manage reports, datasets. or dashboards.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Alisha at Jul 21, 2022, 08:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Providencia
7 months ago
C is interesting, but does it really solve the problem?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
7 months ago
Definitely not D, that gives them too much access!
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
7 months ago
Wait, can they really manage RLS without access to reports? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
8 months ago
I disagree, I think option A could work too. Just add them to the role.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
8 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice. Security groups are a solid way to manage RLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
8 months ago
Granting Read and Build permissions sounds like it could work, but I feel like that might give them too much access. I remember we talked about limiting permissions in our study group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether configuring custom instructions for the Request access feature would actually help in this scenario. It feels like it might not address the RLS maintenance directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
8 months ago
I think option B makes sense since it allows the security team to manage access without giving them full control over the reports. We practiced something similar in our last session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
8 months ago
I remember we discussed RLS in class, but I'm not sure if adding the security team as members of the RLS role is the right approach. It seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
8 months ago
Wait, is UV irradiation actually an option here? I'm not sure I'm confident in my knowledge of skin decontamination methods. Better double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
8 months ago
Easy peasy! Understandability is super important for architecture docs, along with things like correctness and efficiency. I'm confident I can nail this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions the loss was recorded after the March 31 quarterly report, so I'm not sure if that means it should be included in the June 30 report or not. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky security question. I'll need to think carefully about the potential vulnerabilities in the code examples.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. I know reinvested dividends count towards breakpoints, so that rules out option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
8 months ago
I remember practicing something similar where we had to identify changes that only required field setups. Maybe option C fits that because it's just a field description change?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel