Microsoft PL-300 Exam - Topic 15 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-300 exam

Question #: 11
Topic #: 15

You have a Power Bl report that uses row-level security (RLS).

You need to transfer RLS membership maintenance to an Azure network security team. The solution must NOT provide the Azure network security team with the ability to manage reports, datasets. or dashboards.

What should you do?

AAdd the Azure network security team as members of the RLS role.

BInstruct the Azure network security team to create security groups. Configure RLS to use the groups.

CConfigure custom instructions for the Request access feature that instructs users to contact the Azure network security team.

DGrant the Read and Build permissions for the Power Bl datasets to the Azure network security team.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Alisha at Jul 21, 2022, 08:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Providencia

4 months ago

C is interesting, but does it really solve the problem?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruby

4 months ago

Definitely not D, that gives them too much access!

upvoted 0 times

...

Son

4 months ago

Wait, can they really manage RLS without access to reports? Sounds risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hillary

4 months ago

I disagree, I think option A could work too. Just add them to the role.

upvoted 0 times

...

James

5 months ago

Option B seems like the best choice. Security groups are a solid way to manage RLS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brynn

5 months ago

Granting Read and Build permissions sounds like it could work, but I feel like that might give them too much access. I remember we talked about limiting permissions in our study group.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jordan

5 months ago

I’m a bit confused about whether configuring custom instructions for the Request access feature would actually help in this scenario. It feels like it might not address the RLS maintenance directly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Natalie

5 months ago

I think option B makes sense since it allows the security team to manage access without giving them full control over the reports. We practiced something similar in our last session.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karima

5 months ago

I remember we discussed RLS in class, but I'm not sure if adding the security team as members of the RLS role is the right approach. It seems risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Inocencia

5 months ago

Wait, is UV irradiation actually an option here? I'm not sure I'm confident in my knowledge of skin decontamination methods. Better double-check my notes.

upvoted 0 times

...

James

5 months ago

Easy peasy! Understandability is super important for architecture docs, along with things like correctness and efficiency. I'm confident I can nail this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shelia

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions the loss was recorded after the March 31 quarterly report, so I'm not sure if that means it should be included in the June 30 report or not. I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

5 months ago

This looks like a tricky security question. I'll need to think carefully about the potential vulnerabilities in the code examples.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arminda

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. I know reinvested dividends count towards breakpoints, so that rules out option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerlene

5 months ago

I remember practicing something similar where we had to identify changes that only required field setups. Maybe option C fits that because it's just a field description change?

upvoted 0 times

...