Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft MS-102 Exam - Topic 2 Question 54 Discussion

Posted by Van on Nov 22, 2025 at 05:09 PM

You have a Microsoft 365 subscription.

Your company has a customer ID associated to each customer. The customer IDs contain 10 numbers

followed by 10 characters. The following is a sample customer ID: 12-456-7890-abc-de-fghij.

You plan to create a data loss prevention (DLP) policy that will detect messages containing customer IDs.

D18912E1457D5D1DDCBD40AB3BF70D5D

What should you create to ensure that the DLP policy can detect the customer IDs?

Suggested Answer: A

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/custom-sensitive-info-types?view=o365-worldwide

Get Premium MS-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
SA
Salena 6 months ago
D is definitely not right. Retention labels are for data storage, not detection.
HE
Herminia 6 months ago
C seems irrelevant here. Supervision policies don't fit this need.
IN
India 6 months ago
But B is more about classification, not detection. A is clearer.
CE
Celeste 6 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Sensitivity labels could help too.
FR
Francis 6 months ago
Agreed! A makes sense for detecting patterns like customer IDs.
MA
Mattie 7 months ago
I think A is the best choice. Sensitive info types are designed for this.
EN
Ena 7 months ago
I thought retention labels were for something else?
AN
Anissa 7 months ago
A sensitivity label seems more appropriate, though.
ER
Eric 7 months ago
Wait, can DLP really handle that format?
LA
Lashon 7 months ago
Totally agree, that's the right move.
EM
Emilio 8 months ago
Sensitive information type, the only way to go. Unless you want your boss to have a heart attack!
JE
Jerilyn 8 months ago
A sensitive information type, no doubt about it. Wouldn't want those customer IDs leaking out!
YU
Yuriko 8 months ago
Hmm, a sensitive information type sounds like the right choice. Gotta keep those customer IDs safe!
CH
Chery 8 months ago
Sensitive information type, easy peasy.
BI
Billy 9 months ago
I agree, a sensitive information type is the way to do it.
EM
Emerson 9 months ago
Definitely a sensitive information type. That's the way to go.
LU
Luz 9 months ago
I’m confused between sensitive information type and retention label. I need to recall which one is used for detection versus storage.
RA
Raelene 9 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice scenario we did on DLP policies. I feel like a supervision policy might not be the right choice here.
GL
Glenna 9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about sensitivity labels being more about classifying data rather than detecting it.
KA
Kattie 9 months ago
I think we need to create a sensitive information type since it specifically deals with identifying patterns like customer IDs.
LA
Laticia 10 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. Is a retention label the right option, or should I go with the sensitive information type? I'll need to double-check the details to make sure I'm selecting the correct answer.
BU
Buddy 10 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. A sensitive information type is the right choice to identify those 10-number, 10-character customer IDs in the messages. I'll make sure to set it up properly.
LI
Lili 10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking us to detect customer IDs in messages, so a sensitive information type is definitely the way to go. I'll make sure to include all the details about the format of the customer IDs.
ST
Stevie 10 months ago
You need to create a sensitive information type!
PA
Pamella 11 months ago
A sensitive information type is the correct answer here.
MA
Malcom 11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Do we need to create a sensitivity label or a supervision policy instead? I'm not sure which one would be the right approach here.
MA
Marvel 11 months ago
I think I'll go with option A. Creating a sensitive information type seems like the best way to detect those customer IDs in the messages.
EM
Emogene 4 months ago
↳ replying to Marvel
Good call! We need to keep those IDs safe.
CH
Cherelle 5 months ago
↳ replying to Marvel
Option A is the best way to protect customer data.
TH
Thomasena 6 months ago
↳ replying to Marvel
Definitely! It’s the right choice for detecting specific patterns.
WI
Wilda 10 months ago
↳ replying to Marvel
I agree, option A makes the most sense.
LA
Laura 11 months ago
↳ replying to Marvel
Yeah, sensitive information types are designed for this.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel