Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MS-102 Exam - Topic 2 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MS-102 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 2
[All MS-102 Questions]

You have a Microsoft 365 subscription.

Your company has a customer ID associated to each customer. The customer IDs contain 10 numbers

followed by 10 characters. The following is a sample customer ID: 12-456-7890-abc-de-fghij.

You plan to create a data loss prevention (DLP) policy that will detect messages containing customer IDs.

D18912E1457D5D1DDCBD40AB3BF70D5D

What should you create to ensure that the DLP policy can detect the customer IDs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/custom-sensitive-info-types?view=o365-worldwide

by Van at Nov 22, 2025, 05:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MS-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Salena
17 days ago
D is definitely not right. Retention labels are for data storage, not detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
22 days ago
C seems irrelevant here. Supervision policies don't fit this need.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
27 days ago
But B is more about classification, not detection. A is clearer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
1 month ago
I'm leaning towards B. Sensitivity labels could help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
1 month ago
Agreed! A makes sense for detecting patterns like customer IDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
1 month ago
I think A is the best choice. Sensitive info types are designed for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
2 months ago
I thought retention labels were for something else?
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
2 months ago
A sensitivity label seems more appropriate, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
2 months ago
Wait, can DLP really handle that format?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
2 months ago
Totally agree, that's the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
3 months ago
Sensitive information type, the only way to go. Unless you want your boss to have a heart attack!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
3 months ago
A sensitive information type, no doubt about it. Wouldn't want those customer IDs leaking out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
3 months ago
Hmm, a sensitive information type sounds like the right choice. Gotta keep those customer IDs safe!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
3 months ago
Sensitive information type, easy peasy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
3 months ago
I agree, a sensitive information type is the way to do it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
4 months ago
Definitely a sensitive information type. That's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
4 months ago
I’m confused between sensitive information type and retention label. I need to recall which one is used for detection versus storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
4 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice scenario we did on DLP policies. I feel like a supervision policy might not be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about sensitivity labels being more about classifying data rather than detecting it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
4 months ago
I think we need to create a sensitive information type since it specifically deals with identifying patterns like customer IDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
4 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. Is a retention label the right option, or should I go with the sensitive information type? I'll need to double-check the details to make sure I'm selecting the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. A sensitive information type is the right choice to identify those 10-number, 10-character customer IDs in the messages. I'll make sure to set it up properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking us to detect customer IDs in messages, so a sensitive information type is definitely the way to go. I'll make sure to include all the details about the format of the customer IDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
5 months ago
You need to create a sensitive information type!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
6 months ago
A sensitive information type is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Do we need to create a sensitivity label or a supervision policy instead? I'm not sure which one would be the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
6 months ago
I think I'll go with option A. Creating a sensitive information type seems like the best way to detect those customer IDs in the messages.
upvoted 0 times
Cherelle
7 days ago
Option A is the best way to protect customer data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
12 days ago
Definitely! It’s the right choice for detecting specific patterns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
5 months ago
I agree, option A makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
5 months ago
Yeah, sensitive information types are designed for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel