Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MB-820 Exam - Topic 5 Question 33 Discussion

You need to determine why the extension does not appear in the tenant.What are two possible reasons for the disappearance? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
B) The extension was not compatible with the new version within 60 days of the first notification. and D) The extension was published as PTE. and the Platform and Runtime parameters were not updated in the application file.
A) The extension was published as a DEV extension.
C) The extension was published as PTE. and the Platform parameter was not updated in the application file.
E) The extension was not compatible with the new version within 90 days of the first notification.

Microsoft MB-820 Exam - Topic 5 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-820 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 5
[All MB-820 Questions]

You need to determine why the extension does not appear in the tenant.

What are two possible reasons for the disappearance? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

In the context of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, an extension may not appear in the tenant for several reasons, particularly after an upgrade to a new major version.

Option A suggests that the extension was published as a DEV extension, which typically would not cause it to disappear after an upgrade because DEV extensions are intended for development and testing within sandbox environments.

Option B indicates that the extension was not compatible with the new version within 60 days of the first notification. This is a likely reason because Microsoft enforces compatibility rules, and extensions that are not made compatible within the specified timeframe might be removed or disabled.

Option C refers to the extension being published as a PTE (Per-Tenant Extension) and mentions the Platform parameter not being updated. This could cause issues, but not specifically the disappearance of the extension after an upgrade.

Option D expands on Option C by adding that both the Platform and Runtime parameters were not updated in the application file. This is a critical aspect because if these parameters are not correctly set to indicate compatibility with the new version of Business Central, the extension could be disabled or removed.

Option E is similar to Option B but mentions a 90-day period. This option does not align with standard Business Central practices for version compatibility requirements.


by Malissa at Jun 10, 2025, 07:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-820 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Marquetta
7 months ago
Not sure about E, sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
7 months ago
Wait, why 60 days? That seems short.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
7 months ago
Definitely B! That makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
7 months ago
I think it could be A or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
8 months ago
I agree with A, but D is also a strong possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between options C and D. I think they both mention PTE, but I can't remember what the exact requirements were for the parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
8 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because I recall something about needing to update both Platform and Runtime parameters for PTE extensions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
8 months ago
I remember a practice question about extensions disappearing due to compatibility issues. I feel like option B might be correct since it mentions a time frame.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
8 months ago
I think option A could be a reason, but I'm not entirely sure if DEV extensions are supposed to show up in the tenant at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
9 months ago
Alright, time to put on my problem-solving hat. I'll read through the question carefully, analyze each option, and try to come up with the two most likely reasons for the extension's disappearance. Gotta nail this one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
9 months ago
This is a good one to really think through. I'm going to make sure I understand the differences between the options and consider all the possible reasons the extension could have disappeared. Gotta get those points!
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the last three options. Something about publishing as PTE and updating the application file parameters. I'll need to make sure I understand those scenarios before selecting any answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
9 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The first two options seem straightforward - either it was published as a DEV extension or it wasn't compatible with the new version within 60 days. I'll make sure to consider those possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
9 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the different scenarios that could cause an extension to disappear from the tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
12 months ago
This is a real head-scratcher. I'm just hoping I don't get 'extension not found' errors on my next project. That would be a real plot twist!
upvoted 0 times
Kimberely
10 months ago
I always double-check those parameters to avoid any 'extension not found' errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
11 months ago
C) The extension was published as PTE. and the Platform parameter was not updated in the application file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
11 months ago
A) The extension was published as a DEV extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wade
12 months ago
B and E, definitely. Whoever published this extension must have been living under a rock if they missed those deadlines!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
12 months ago
I'm going with C and D. Gotta make sure those Platform and Runtime parameters are all up to date, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Willard
11 months ago
I agree, C and D seem like the correct options to choose in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
11 months ago
Yes, you're right. Those parameters need to be updated for the extension to appear.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawn
1 year ago
D seems like the obvious choice here. The extension was published as PTE, and the Platform and Runtime parameters were not updated in the application file.
upvoted 0 times
Ashleigh
11 months ago
Yes, I agree. That seems like the most likely reason for the extension not appearing in the tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
11 months ago
I think D is the correct answer. The Platform and Runtime parameters need to be updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tommy
1 year ago
You might be right, I didn't consider that. Thanks for pointing it out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's C and D because the Platform parameter needs to be updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
1 year ago
I think the possible reasons could be A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
1 year ago
I think the correct answers are B and E. The extension should be compatible with the new version within 60 days of the first notification, and if it's not, it'll disappear.
upvoted 0 times
Earleen
1 year ago
User 3: So, if it's not updated within 90 days, it will also disappear?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
1 year ago
User 2: That's correct. The extension needs to be compatible within 60 days or it will disappear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
1 year ago
User 1: I think the correct answers are B and E.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel