Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-820 Topic 5 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-820 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 5
[All MB-820 Questions]

You need to determine why the extension does not appear in the tenant.

What are two possible reasons for the disappearance? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

In the context of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, an extension may not appear in the tenant for several reasons, particularly after an upgrade to a new major version.

Option A suggests that the extension was published as a DEV extension, which typically would not cause it to disappear after an upgrade because DEV extensions are intended for development and testing within sandbox environments.

Option B indicates that the extension was not compatible with the new version within 60 days of the first notification. This is a likely reason because Microsoft enforces compatibility rules, and extensions that are not made compatible within the specified timeframe might be removed or disabled.

Option C refers to the extension being published as a PTE (Per-Tenant Extension) and mentions the Platform parameter not being updated. This could cause issues, but not specifically the disappearance of the extension after an upgrade.

Option D expands on Option C by adding that both the Platform and Runtime parameters were not updated in the application file. This is a critical aspect because if these parameters are not correctly set to indicate compatibility with the new version of Business Central, the extension could be disabled or removed.

Option E is similar to Option B but mentions a 90-day period. This option does not align with standard Business Central practices for version compatibility requirements.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Keneth
11 days ago
This is a real head-scratcher. I'm just hoping I don't get 'extension not found' errors on my next project. That would be a real plot twist!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
15 days ago
B and E, definitely. Whoever published this extension must have been living under a rock if they missed those deadlines!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
16 days ago
I'm going with C and D. Gotta make sure those Platform and Runtime parameters are all up to date, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Winifred
4 hours ago
Yes, you're right. Those parameters need to be updated for the extension to appear.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawn
25 days ago
D seems like the obvious choice here. The extension was published as PTE, and the Platform and Runtime parameters were not updated in the application file.
upvoted 0 times
Leah
3 days ago
I think D is the correct answer. The Platform and Runtime parameters need to be updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tommy
26 days ago
You might be right, I didn't consider that. Thanks for pointing it out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
29 days ago
I disagree, I believe it's C and D because the Platform parameter needs to be updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
2 months ago
I think the possible reasons could be A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
2 months ago
I think the correct answers are B and E. The extension should be compatible with the new version within 60 days of the first notification, and if it's not, it'll disappear.
upvoted 0 times
Earleen
1 months ago
User 3: So, if it's not updated within 90 days, it will also disappear?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
2 months ago
User 2: That's correct. The extension needs to be compatible within 60 days or it will disappear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
2 months ago
User 1: I think the correct answers are B and E.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel