Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft MB-310 Exam - Topic 1 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 1
[All MB-310 Questions]

You have implemented Dynamics 365 finance.

You must update the fiscal year to a 4-4-5 quarterly configuration.

You need to configure the fiscal year.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Arleen
4 months ago
Hmm, isn't 4-4-5 a bit tricky to set up? Just wondering!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
4 months ago
Totally agree with Colene, C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
4 months ago
Wait, why would you set it to 13 months? That doesn't make sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
4 months ago
I think D is the better choice, adjusting the ending date is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
5 months ago
Option C seems right, 1 year divided quarterly fits 4-4-5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
5 months ago
I recall that a 4-4-5 setup requires specific adjustments, so I think option A could be misleading since it talks about 12 months instead of focusing on the quarterly breakdown.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the period length. Shouldn't it be 1 year for a fiscal year? I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to adjust fiscal periods, and I feel like option D might be the right choice since it mentions adjusting the ending dates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
5 months ago
I think I remember that a 4-4-5 configuration means we need to set up periods that align with that structure, but I'm not sure which option does that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Is it asking us to configure the fiscal year to a 4-4-5 structure, or is it just saying that we need to configure the fiscal year and the 4-4-5 is additional context? I want to make sure I understand the requirement before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key here is to set up the period length to 1 year and then divide it according to the 4-4-5 quarterly configuration. That's option C, and it's the clear winner in my mind. I'm feeling good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the 4-4-5 quarterly configuration. I'll need to double-check the details on that before I can confidently select the right answer. Maybe I'll jot down a quick note to review that concept again before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question about configuring the fiscal year in Dynamics 365 Finance. I think I've got a good handle on the 4-4-5 quarterly configuration, so I'll carefully review the options and go with the one that best matches that requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the answer is not SWIPE or S/MIME, since those are more for email security. SKIP and SLIP sound more like network protocols, so I'll focus on those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
1 year ago
But option A makes more sense because it aligns with the 4-4-5 quarterly configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
1 year ago
Gotta love those tricky fiscal year questions. I'm confident C is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Shala
1 year ago
User 4: Definitely, C is the way to go for updating the fiscal year to a 4-4-5 quarterly configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
1 year ago
Yeah, C seems like the most logical choice for configuring the fiscal year in Dynamics 365 finance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
1 year ago
Yeah, that seems like the most logical choice for configuring the fiscal year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
1 year ago
I agree, setting up the length of the period to 1 year and dividing it quarterly makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
1 year ago
I agree, setting up the length of the period to 1 year and dividing it quarterly seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
1 year ago
I think C is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
1 year ago
I think C is the correct option too. It makes sense to divide the period according to the quarterly configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tashia
1 year ago
I think we should choose option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote option B was just messing with us. Definitely going with C - it's the only one that makes sense for a 4-4-5 configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
2 years ago
B? Really? 13 months in a fiscal year? That's just crazy talk. I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
2 years ago
Option D looks good to me. Adjusting the ending date of each period sounds like the simplest approach.
upvoted 0 times
Sheron
1 year ago
Let's go with option D then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
1 year ago
I agree, it's a straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
1 year ago
Yeah, adjusting the ending date of each period seems like the easiest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
1 year ago
I think option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Magda
2 years ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Dividing the year into 4-4-5 quarters is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Katie
2 years ago
I agree, setting up the length of the period to 1 year and dividing it according to the quarterly configuration makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
2 years ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Dividing the year into 4-4-5 quarters is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel