Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MB-310 Exam - Topic 1 Question 106 Discussion

You have implemented Dynamics 365 finance.You must update the fiscal year to a 4-4-5 quarterly configuration.You need to configure the fiscal year.What should you do?
C) Set up the length of the period to 1 year and divide the period according to the quarterly configuration.
A) Configure the period length to 12 months and adjust the ending date of each period.
B) Set up the length of the period to 13 months.
D) Configure the period length to 1 year and adjust the ending date of each period.

Microsoft MB-310 Exam - Topic 1 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 1
[All MB-310 Questions]

You have implemented Dynamics 365 finance.

You must update the fiscal year to a 4-4-5 quarterly configuration.

You need to configure the fiscal year.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lakeesha at Sep 17, 2024, 12:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-310 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Arleen
10 months ago
Hmm, isn't 4-4-5 a bit tricky to set up? Just wondering!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
10 months ago
Totally agree with Colene, C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
10 months ago
Wait, why would you set it to 13 months? That doesn't make sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
11 months ago
I think D is the better choice, adjusting the ending date is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
11 months ago
Option C seems right, 1 year divided quarterly fits 4-4-5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
11 months ago
I recall that a 4-4-5 setup requires specific adjustments, so I think option A could be misleading since it talks about 12 months instead of focusing on the quarterly breakdown.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the period length. Shouldn't it be 1 year for a fiscal year? I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to adjust fiscal periods, and I feel like option D might be the right choice since it mentions adjusting the ending dates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
12 months ago
I think I remember that a 4-4-5 configuration means we need to set up periods that align with that structure, but I'm not sure which option does that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Is it asking us to configure the fiscal year to a 4-4-5 structure, or is it just saying that we need to configure the fiscal year and the 4-4-5 is additional context? I want to make sure I understand the requirement before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
12 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key here is to set up the period length to 1 year and then divide it according to the 4-4-5 quarterly configuration. That's option C, and it's the clear winner in my mind. I'm feeling good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the 4-4-5 quarterly configuration. I'll need to double-check the details on that before I can confidently select the right answer. Maybe I'll jot down a quick note to review that concept again before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
12 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question about configuring the fiscal year in Dynamics 365 Finance. I think I've got a good handle on the 4-4-5 quarterly configuration, so I'll carefully review the options and go with the one that best matches that requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the answer is not SWIPE or S/MIME, since those are more for email security. SKIP and SLIP sound more like network protocols, so I'll focus on those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
2 years ago
But option A makes more sense because it aligns with the 4-4-5 quarterly configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
2 years ago
Gotta love those tricky fiscal year questions. I'm confident C is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Shala
2 years ago
User 4: Definitely, C is the way to go for updating the fiscal year to a 4-4-5 quarterly configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
2 years ago
Yeah, C seems like the most logical choice for configuring the fiscal year in Dynamics 365 finance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
2 years ago
Yeah, that seems like the most logical choice for configuring the fiscal year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
2 years ago
I agree, setting up the length of the period to 1 year and dividing it quarterly makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
2 years ago
I agree, setting up the length of the period to 1 year and dividing it quarterly seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 years ago
I think C is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
2 years ago
I think C is the correct option too. It makes sense to divide the period according to the quarterly configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tashia
2 years ago
I think we should choose option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote option B was just messing with us. Definitely going with C - it's the only one that makes sense for a 4-4-5 configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
2 years ago
B? Really? 13 months in a fiscal year? That's just crazy talk. I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
2 years ago
Option D looks good to me. Adjusting the ending date of each period sounds like the simplest approach.
upvoted 0 times
Sheron
2 years ago
Let's go with option D then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
2 years ago
I agree, it's a straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
2 years ago
Yeah, adjusting the ending date of each period seems like the easiest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
2 years ago
I think option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Magda
2 years ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Dividing the year into 4-4-5 quarters is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Katie
2 years ago
I agree, setting up the length of the period to 1 year and dividing it according to the quarterly configuration makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
2 years ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Dividing the year into 4-4-5 quarters is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel