Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-230 Topic 8 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-230 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 8
[All MB-230 Questions]

A company is implementing Omnichannel for Dynamics 365 Customer Service. The company's requirements are:

* Live chat must be available through Omnichannel for cases only.

* High-priority cases must automatically be sent to the next available agent.

* Lower-priority cases must wait to be picked up by an agent

* All work must be distributed evenly with no other conditions.

You need to select the setup that meets the requirements. Which setup should you select?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ettie
29 days ago
Wait, so we have to distribute the work evenly, but also send high-priority cases to the next available agent? Sounds like a recipe for chaos! I hope the answer involves some kind of magic wand.
upvoted 0 times
Pearly
17 days ago
A: I think we should go with option C, two workstreams and two routing rules per workstream.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammy
1 months ago
Option A is just way too basic. I mean, how are we supposed to handle the priority cases and even workload distribution with just one workstream and one routing rule? Nah, not happening.
upvoted 0 times
Mila
2 days ago
Exactly, option B or C would be a better choice for meeting the requirements effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
3 days ago
I agree, option A is definitely too basic. We need more flexibility to handle the different case priorities and workload distribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
3 days ago
That sounds like the best option to meet all of our requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
4 days ago
C) two workstreams and two routing rules per workstream
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
9 days ago
I think we should go with option C, two workstreams and two routing rules per workstream.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
14 days ago
I agree, we need a setup that can handle high-priority cases and evenly distribute workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
20 days ago
Option A is definitely not the right choice for our requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
24 days ago
B) one workstream and two routing rules
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tracey
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D. Two workstreams and one routing rule per workstream should give us the flexibility we need while keeping things simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
2 months ago
Because having two workstreams and two routing rules per workstream will help distribute the work evenly and prioritize high-priority cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
2 months ago
Hmm, option C seems more comprehensive with two workstreams and two routing rules per workstream. That way, we can really fine-tune the case handling process.
upvoted 0 times
Long
10 days ago
Yeah, having two workstreams and two routing rules per workstream would definitely help distribute the workload evenly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
16 days ago
I agree, option C does seem like the best choice for meeting all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vi
2 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
2 months ago
I think we should go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
2 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. One workstream and two routing rules should cover the live chat for cases and the priority handling requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Lucina
20 days ago
Let's go with option B for the setup then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
21 days ago
One workstream should be enough to manage live chat for cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 months ago
Having two routing rules can help ensure high-priority cases are handled quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
1 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice for meeting all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel