Microsoft Exam MB-210 Topic 2 Question 112 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-210 exam

Question #: 112
Topic #: 2

[All MB-210 Questions]

You need to add the unfavorable credit and reference check reasons to the RFQ close process. What should you do?

ACreate custom activities for the credit and reference checks.

BAdd a stage to the business process flow.

CConvert the credit and reference activities lo an opportunity.

DDelete the RFQ Lead record.

ECreate custom status reasons.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Dolores at Jan 09, 2025, 07:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-210 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Salome

4 months ago

Hah, I bet the sellers would love a solution that involves less code. Option B is probably the way to go, unless they really want to get their hands dirty with a plug-in.

upvoted 0 times

Sue

3 months ago

D: It's important to streamline the process for the sellers, so Option B is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

3 months ago

C: I agree, having a new duplicate detection rule for leads would be more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

3 months ago

B: Yeah, it would definitely make things easier for the sellers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

3 months ago

D: That sounds like a plan. It should help streamline the process for the sellers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eura

3 months ago

C: Option B it is then. Let's go with creating a new duplicate detection rule for leads.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlen

4 months ago

B: Yeah, I agree. It would make it easier for the sellers to avoid duplicate records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Osvaldo

4 months ago

A: Option B sounds like the best choice for this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharika

4 months ago

A: Option B sounds like the best choice for a low-code solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kate

4 months ago

Option D is an interesting choice, but I'm not sure it's the most efficient solution. A custom duplicate detection plug-in might be overkill for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lera

5 months ago

Hmm, I think Option C might be the best choice here. Creating a new duplicate detection rule for contacts could help catch any potential issues at the source.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reiko

5 months ago

I'm not sure why they wouldn't just go with Option A and update the existing duplicate detection rule for leads. Seems like a simpler fix to me.

upvoted 0 times

Dianne

4 months ago

I agree, updating the existing rule for leads seems like the most straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashon

4 months ago

Option A) Update the leads with the same email address duplicate detection rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

5 months ago

I disagree. I believe updating the leads with the same email address rule would be more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wade

5 months ago

I agree with Joni. It makes sense to have a specific rule for leads to avoid duplicates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billy

5 months ago

Option B seems to be the way to go. Creating a new duplicate detection rule for leads would be the most straightforward solution to address the issue.

upvoted 0 times