Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft DP-900 Exam - Topic 11 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-900 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 11
[All DP-900 Questions]

You have a SQL pool in Azure Synapse Analytics that is only used actively every night for eight hours.

You need to minimize the cost of the SQL pool during idle times. The solution must ensure that the data

remains intact.

What should you do on the SQL pool?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Yan at May 01, 2024, 05:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-900 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Peggy
4 months ago
User-defined restore points are cool, but not the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
4 months ago
I disagree, deleting the pool is not a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
4 months ago
Wait, can you really just pause it? Sounds too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
William
4 months ago
Scaling down DWUs is a good idea too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
5 months ago
Definitely pause the pool when not in use!
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
5 months ago
Creating a user-defined restore point sounds useful, but I don't see how it relates to minimizing costs during idle times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where pausing was the best option for cost savings. I feel confident about that choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
5 months ago
I think scaling down the DWUs might help, but it could still incur some costs. I need to double-check how that works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
5 months ago
I remember that pausing the SQL pool can save costs during idle times, but I'm not sure if it affects data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
5 months ago
Pausing the pool sounds like the way to go. That will stop the billing while preserving the data, which is exactly what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
5 months ago
Deleting the pool is definitely not the right answer here - we need to keep the data. I'm leaning towards pausing the pool as the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between scaling down the DWUs and pausing the pool. Can someone clarify the pros and cons of each option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
5 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer here. Pausing the pool seems like the best way to minimize costs while keeping the data intact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
6 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the options and how they impact the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
6 months ago
This seems a bit complex, with all the different Kubernetes resources involved. I better double-check my work to make sure I'm not missing anything. Don't want to mess this up on the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
6 months ago
This is right in my wheelhouse! As someone who's worked in retail finance, I'm pretty confident I know the ins and outs of the pension transfer specialist training and certification. I'll breeze through this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
6 months ago
I'm pretty sure the sequence number is used to detect losses, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question on quality objectives, and that seemed more like their responsibility. But I'm not completely sure about the education modules part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
10 months ago
Pause the pool? More like 'pause the party' for those idle hours. But hey, at least you'll be saving some cash in the process. It's a win-win, right? Cha-ching!
upvoted 0 times
Emogene
8 months ago
B) Pause the pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
9 months ago
A) Scale down the data warehouse units (DWUs).
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
9 months ago
B) Pause the pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
9 months ago
A) Scale down the data warehouse units (DWUs).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vanda
10 months ago
A) Scale down the DWUs - Not a bad idea, but it doesn't really address the 'idle time' problem. You'd still be paying for the compute resources, just at a lower level. Pausing the pool is definitely the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Harrison
9 months ago
B) Pause the pool
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
A) Scale down the DWUs
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lettie
11 months ago
D) Delete the pool? Seriously? That's like throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I'm pretty sure the question said the data needs to remain intact, and deleting the pool would just be a waste of time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
Rory
10 months ago
C) Create a user-defined restore point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
10 months ago
B) Pause the pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
10 months ago
A) Scale down the data warehouse units (DWUs).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dick
11 months ago
I'm torn between B and C. Pausing the pool is the easiest, but creating a user-defined restore point could be handy if you need to quickly restore the pool later. Hmm, decisions, decisions.
upvoted 0 times
Effie
10 months ago
C) Create a user-defined restore point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
10 months ago
B) Pause the pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
10 months ago
A) Scale down the data warehouse units (DWUs).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Berry
11 months ago
I think scaling down the data warehouse units could also be a good option to consider. It might help in reducing costs while keeping the data intact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
11 months ago
I agree with Christoper. Pausing the pool seems like the best option to save money.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
11 months ago
B) Pause the pool - This is the most obvious choice. Pausing the pool will stop the compute resources and reduce the cost during idle times. The data will remain intact, and you can resume the pool when needed.
upvoted 0 times
Yan
11 months ago
B) Pause the pool - This is the most obvious choice. Pausing the pool will stop the compute resources and reduce the cost during idle times. The data will remain intact, and you can resume the pool when needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
11 months ago
A) Scale down the data warehouse units (DWUs).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christoper
11 months ago
I think we should pause the pool to minimize costs during idle times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
11 months ago
I disagree. I think scaling down the data warehouse units (DWUs) would be more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
11 months ago
I agree with Wilbert. Pausing the pool seems like the best option to save costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
11 months ago
I think we should pause the pool to minimize cost during idle times.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel