Microsoft DP-700 Exam - Topic 2 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-700 exam

Question #: 4
Topic #: 2

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have a Fabric eventstream that loads data into a table named Bike_Location in a KQL database. The table contains the following columns:

You need to apply transformation and filter logic to prepare the data for consumption. The solution must return data for a neighbourhood named Sands End when No_Bikes is at least 15. The results must be ordered by No_Bikes in ascending order.

Solution: You use the following code segment:

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

Bno

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

This code does not meet the goal because it uses order by, which is not valid in KQL. The correct term in KQL is sort by.

Correct code should look like:

by Carmela at Jan 11, 2025, 01:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Estrella

4 months ago

Not sure if this meets all the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorriane

4 months ago

Wait, is it really ordered by No_Bikes?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mary

4 months ago

I think it might miss some edge cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janet

4 months ago

Sounds good to me, should work!

upvoted 0 times

...

Domingo

5 months ago

The code filters for Sands End and No_Bikes >= 15.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alecia

5 months ago

I feel like I practiced this type of query before, but I can't recall if the syntax is exactly right for the conditions given.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thersa

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the ordering part. Does it really sort by No_Bikes in ascending order as required?

upvoted 0 times

...

Marva

5 months ago

I remember a similar question where we had to filter and sort data. I hope I applied the right logic here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeann

5 months ago

I think the code should filter for the neighbourhood correctly, but I'm not sure if it handles the No_Bikes condition properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

5 months ago

I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. What does it mean that "these questions will not appear in the review screen"? Does that mean I can't go back and check my work? If so, that's a bit concerning. I want to make sure I fully understand the requirements before committing to an answer. Let me re-read this a couple times to make sure I'm not missing anything.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salome

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key things I need to focus on are the filtering for Sands End and the No_Bikes >= 15 condition, as well as the ordering. The code snippet looks good to me - it's using the right columns and logic to meet those requirements. I'll go with that solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doretha

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions that there might be multiple correct solutions, so I want to make sure I fully understand the requirements before committing to an answer. Let me re-read the question carefully and see if I can come up with an alternative approach just to be safe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

5 months ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward query. I'd start by breaking down the requirements - we need to filter for the Sands End neighbourhood and where No_Bikes is at least 15, then order the results by No_Bikes ascending. The code segment provided looks like it should meet those goals, so I'd go with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamar

1 year ago

I agree with both of you. The code segment seems to fulfill the requirements for the neighbourhood named Sands End.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

1 year ago

I think the code segment does meet the goal because it orders the results by No_Bikes in ascending order.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clement

1 year ago

I agree with the others, this solution should work. Though I have to say, the name 'Bike_Location' makes me wonder if the bikes are actually located in the neighborhood or just visiting. Maybe they should call it 'Bikes_In_Sands_End' instead.

upvoted 0 times

Mozelle

1 year ago

B) no

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

1 year ago

I agree, 'Bikes_In_Sands_End' would be a more accurate name.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celestine

1 year ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Jenifer

1 year ago

Yes, the code segment filters data for Sands End with at least 15 bikes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

1 year ago

I think the solution is correct. The query seems to be doing what's required - returning the data for Sands End with No_Bikes >= 15, and ordering the results properly.

upvoted 0 times

France

1 year ago

I think the solution is correct. The query seems to be doing what's required - returning the data for Sands End with No_Bikes >= 15, and ordering the results properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margarita

1 year ago

Great, it looks like the query is working as expected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felton

1 year ago

B) no

upvoted 0 times

...

France

1 year ago

I agree, the solution meets the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edelmira

1 year ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Ma

1 year ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

1 year ago

The code looks good to me. It filters the data for Sands End neighbourhood and orders the results by No_Bikes in ascending order. Looks like it meets the goal.

upvoted 0 times

Johnathon

1 year ago

The code looks good to me. It filters the data for Sands End neighbourhood and orders the results by No_Bikes in ascending order. Looks like it meets the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carman

1 year ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...