Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft DP-100 Exam - Topic 4 Question 121 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-100 exam
Question #: 121
Topic #: 4
[All DP-100 Questions]

You use Azure Machine Learning to train a model.

You must use a sampling method for tuning hyperparameters. The sampling method must pick samples based on how the model performed with previous samples.

You need to select a sampling method.

Which sampling method should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Clay at Jan 26, 2025, 07:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Maybelle
5 months ago
I thought grid search was still popular for hyperparameter tuning?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure Bayesian is the best choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
5 months ago
Random sampling? Nah, that won't cut it here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
5 months ago
Grid search is too rigid for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
6 months ago
Definitely go with Bayesian! It uses past performance to guide sampling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards Bayesian too, but I wonder if there are cases where Grid might actually work better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think Random sampling doesn’t really consider past performance, so it might not be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
6 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like Grid search is more systematic, while Bayesian could be more efficient for tuning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
6 months ago
I remember studying different sampling methods, and I think Bayesian sampling is the one that adapts based on previous performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
6 months ago
I think Bayesian sampling is the best choice for this scenario. It's designed to intelligently explore the hyperparameter space and converge on the optimal settings, which is exactly what we need to do here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
6 months ago
Random search might be a good option here. It's simple to implement and can sometimes find good hyperparameters without making too many assumptions about the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
6 months ago
Bayesian sampling sounds like the way to go. It should be able to efficiently explore the hyperparameter space and zero in on the optimal settings based on the model's performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
6 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know grid search and random search are common methods, but I'm not as familiar with Bayesian sampling. I'll need to review the differences between them to make a confident decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
7 months ago
I think the Bayesian sampling method would be the best choice here. It's designed to optimize the hyperparameters based on the performance of previous samples.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
11 months ago
If I choose random sampling, I might as well just throw darts at the answer choices and hope for the best. Bayesian is the way to go, hands down.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
10 months ago
B) Bayesian
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
10 months ago
A) Grid
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorian
11 months ago
Bayesian sampling is the clear winner here. It's like having a crystal ball that tells you which samples to try next. Grid and random sampling are so last century.
upvoted 0 times
Rodrigo
10 months ago
User 3: Grid and random sampling are outdated compared to Bayesian sampling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
10 months ago
User 2: I agree, Bayesian sampling is like having a crystal ball for picking the right samples.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
11 months ago
User 1: I think we should use Bayesian sampling for tuning hyperparameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jonelle
12 months ago
Grid sampling might work, but it's not the most efficient method for tuning hyperparameters. Bayesian is the way to go if you want to optimize your model's performance.
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
10 months ago
Random sampling might not be as effective as Bayesian for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
11 months ago
I agree, Bayesian sampling is more efficient for tuning hyperparameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
11 months ago
I think Bayesian sampling would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlette
1 year ago
I'm not sure. Grid sampling is also a valid option, as it exhaustively searches through all possible combinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
1 year ago
Random sampling? Really? That doesn't sound like it would be very effective for tuning hyperparameters. I'm going with Bayesian on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Boris
11 months ago
Random sampling might not be the most effective method for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
12 months ago
I agree, Bayesian sampling is a better choice for tuning hyperparameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sanjuana
1 year ago
I agree with Gracie. Bayesian sampling considers previous samples, which can lead to better hyperparameter tuning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
1 year ago
I think we should use Bayesian sampling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
1 year ago
I think Bayesian sampling would be the best choice here. It's designed to pick samples based on previous performance, which is exactly what the question asks for.
upvoted 0 times
Bulah
11 months ago
I would go with Bayesian sampling for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
11 months ago
Bayesian sampling is definitely the right option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
11 months ago
I think Bayesian sampling is the most suitable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
11 months ago
I agree, Bayesian sampling is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel