Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam DP-100 Topic 4 Question 121 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-100 exam
Question #: 121
Topic #: 4
[All DP-100 Questions]

You use Azure Machine Learning to train a model.

You must use a sampling method for tuning hyperparameters. The sampling method must pick samples based on how the model performed with previous samples.

You need to select a sampling method.

Which sampling method should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Vince
3 months ago
If I choose random sampling, I might as well just throw darts at the answer choices and hope for the best. Bayesian is the way to go, hands down.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
2 months ago
B) Bayesian
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
2 months ago
A) Grid
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorian
3 months ago
Bayesian sampling is the clear winner here. It's like having a crystal ball that tells you which samples to try next. Grid and random sampling are so last century.
upvoted 0 times
Rodrigo
2 months ago
User 3: Grid and random sampling are outdated compared to Bayesian sampling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, Bayesian sampling is like having a crystal ball for picking the right samples.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
2 months ago
User 1: I think we should use Bayesian sampling for tuning hyperparameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jonelle
3 months ago
Grid sampling might work, but it's not the most efficient method for tuning hyperparameters. Bayesian is the way to go if you want to optimize your model's performance.
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
2 months ago
Random sampling might not be as effective as Bayesian for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
2 months ago
I agree, Bayesian sampling is more efficient for tuning hyperparameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
3 months ago
I think Bayesian sampling would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlette
4 months ago
I'm not sure. Grid sampling is also a valid option, as it exhaustively searches through all possible combinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
4 months ago
Random sampling? Really? That doesn't sound like it would be very effective for tuning hyperparameters. I'm going with Bayesian on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Boris
3 months ago
Random sampling might not be the most effective method for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
3 months ago
I agree, Bayesian sampling is a better choice for tuning hyperparameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sanjuana
4 months ago
I agree with Gracie. Bayesian sampling considers previous samples, which can lead to better hyperparameter tuning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
4 months ago
I think we should use Bayesian sampling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
4 months ago
I think Bayesian sampling would be the best choice here. It's designed to pick samples based on previous performance, which is exactly what the question asks for.
upvoted 0 times
Bulah
2 months ago
I would go with Bayesian sampling for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
2 months ago
Bayesian sampling is definitely the right option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
2 months ago
I think Bayesian sampling is the most suitable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
3 months ago
I agree, Bayesian sampling is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel