Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-900 Exam - Topic 19 Question 74 Discussion

Posted by Antione on May 30, 2023 at 02:16 PM

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

Your company has an Azure subscription that contains the following unused resources:

* 20 user accounts in Azure Active Directory (Azure AD)

* Five groups in Azure AD

* 10 public [P addresses

* 10 network interfaces

You need to reduce the Azure costs for the company.

Solution: You remove the unused groups.

Does this meet the goal?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium AZ-900 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
SA
Sang 11 months ago
Yes, but it’s not the best solution for overall cost reduction.
LE
Levi 11 months ago
You can save more by deleting unused IPs and network interfaces.
AN
Annamaria 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure that removing groups actually saves money?
EU
Eugene 11 months ago
Totally agree, those groups are just a small part of it!
GA
Gaston 12 months ago
Removing unused groups won't cut costs much.
SA
Santos 12 months ago
This seems similar to a question we did on resource management, but I can't recall if groups were mentioned as a cost factor.
LE
Leanora 1 year ago
I feel like we discussed that groups are more for organization and don’t really contribute to costs. So, I’m leaning towards "No."
KR
Kris 1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we had to identify which resources actually cost money. I think user accounts and public IPs might be more relevant.
GI
Gilbert 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure if removing groups will actually reduce costs since they don't directly incur charges.
SA
Sabra 1 year ago
No problem, I've done stuff like this before. I'll just methodically select each object and use the stacking commands to put them in the right order. Shouldn't take long at all.
LA
Lawana 1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I'd go with OnSelect since the question mentions the user clicking a button to proceed to the next screen.
RI
Rikki 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. Using a FastL4 profile or a default caching profile doesn't seem directly related to the stated issues. I'll need to think this through more carefully.
LA
Lacresha 1 year ago
Removing the groups is a good first step, but I'd want to see the actual cost savings before saying it meets the goal. Maybe we could use those IP addresses to summon a cost-cutting genie?
CO
Corrinne 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lacresha
User 3: Agreed, we should check the actual cost savings first before deciding
KR
Kristofer 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lacresha
User 2: No
VI
Vilma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lacresha
User 1: Yes
AL
Alishia 1 year ago
Yeah, getting rid of those unused groups is a no-brainer. Now, if only we could delete the Azure AD user accounts like we do with our old socks, that would be even better!
CR
Cristal 1 year ago
Removing the groups is a step in the right direction, but I think we should also look at the other unused resources like the IP addresses and network interfaces.
MY
Myrtie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cristal
User 4: No, we should only focus on removing the unused groups for now.
IR
Ira 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cristal
User 3: Agreed, removing all unused resources will help cut down on Azure costs.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cristal
User 2: Yes, that's a good start, but we should also consider the other unused resources like IP addresses and network interfaces.
NO
Noe 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cristal
User 1: I think we should remove the unused groups to reduce costs.
AN
Anastacia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cristal
User 4: No, just removing the groups may not be enough to meet the goal of reducing Azure costs.
RE
Reena 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cristal
User 3: Agreed, we should definitely address the IP addresses and network interfaces to reduce Azure costs.
AR
Arlette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cristal
User 2: Yes, removing the groups is a step in the right direction, but we need to consider all the unused resources.
WI
William 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cristal
User 1: I think we should also look at the other unused resources like the IP addresses and network interfaces.
RA
Raymon 1 year ago
But what about the user accounts and other resources? Will removing groups be enough to reduce costs significantly?
CH
Christiane 1 year ago
Removing the unused groups seems like a good start, but I'm not sure if that alone will reduce the overall Azure costs significantly.
AL
Aleshia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Christiane
User 2: B) No
LU
Ludivina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Christiane
User 1: A) Yes
RA
Rana 2 years ago
I agree with Wilda, removing unused groups seems like a good idea.
WI
Wilda 2 years ago
I think we should remove the unused groups to reduce costs.
MA
Marge 2 years ago
But what about the other unused resources like user accounts and network interfaces?
ME
Meaghan 2 years ago
I agree with Kati, removing unused groups is a good way to cut down on expenses.
KA
Kati 2 years ago
I think removing the unused groups will help reduce costs.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel