Microsoft AZ-801 Exam - Topic 4 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-801 exam

Question #: 72
Topic #: 4

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have a failover cluster named Cluster! that hosts an application named Appl.

The General tab in App1 Properties is shown in the General exhibit (Click the General tab.)

The Failover tab in App1 Properties is shown in the Failover exhibit. (Click the Failover tab.)

Server2 shuts down unexpectedly.

You need to ensure that when you start Server2, App1 continues to run on Server2.

Solution: You pause the Server1 node in Cluster1 and then start Server1.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Ligia at Jan 25, 2025, 11:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-801 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Shalon

3 months ago

No way, Server2 needs to be active for App1 to run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

3 months ago

Surprised that this is even an option, seems counterintuitive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

3 months ago

I thought pausing would keep the cluster stable?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozelle

4 months ago

Totally agree, that's not a valid solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corinne

4 months ago

Pausing Server1 won't help if Server2 is down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

4 months ago

I think the answer is "No" because pausing Server1 doesn't really affect Server2's ability to run App1 when it starts up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

4 months ago

I feel like I studied this scenario, but I can't recall if pausing a node would allow the application to continue running on another node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosio

5 months ago

This seems similar to a practice question where we had to manage node failover. I think the solution might not meet the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

5 months ago

I remember something about node states in clusters, but I'm not sure if pausing Server1 would actually help App1 run on Server2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

5 months ago

I think I have a strategy for this. Since Server2 is the failover node, I'll need to make sure that it's properly configured to take over App1 when Server1 goes down. I'll need to review the Failover tab settings to ensure that the failover is set up correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

5 months ago

Based on the information in the exhibits, it looks like App1 is currently running on Server1, and Server2 is the failover node. So the goal is likely to ensure that when Server2 is brought back online, App1 automatically fails over to it. Pausing Server1 doesn't seem like the right approach here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It mentions that the solution provided might not meet the goal, but it doesn't give any additional context on what the actual goal is. I'll need to carefully analyze the exhibits to try and determine the expected behavior.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgilio

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question states that Server2 has shut down unexpectedly, and I need to ensure that when Server2 is started, App1 continues to run on it. Pausing Server1 and then starting it doesn't seem like the right approach here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the information provided in the exhibits to understand the current state of the cluster and the application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trinidad

1 year ago

Uh, no, this is definitely not the correct solution. Pausing the wrong node is just going to make things worse, not better. Let's think this through a bit more carefully.

upvoted 0 times

Bettina

12 months ago

User2: Agreed, we need to come up with a better plan.

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

12 months ago

User1: Pausing the wrong node is not the right solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lino

1 year ago

Haha, this is like trying to put out a fire by throwing gasoline on it. Pausing Server1 is not going to help App1 run on Server2 when it starts up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

1 year ago

Oof, talk about a classic case of 'not the sharpest tool in the shed'. Pausing the wrong node? That's a recipe for disaster, not a solution.

upvoted 0 times

Kirk

11 months ago

Agreed, that would just make things worse.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reena

11 months ago

Definitely not the best idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincenza

12 months ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Verda

12 months ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

1 year ago

Wait, what? Pausing the wrong node? That's like trying to fix a flat tire on the wrong car. I don't think this solution will work.

upvoted 0 times

Laquita

12 months ago

User1: Agreed, let's go with that option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

1 year ago

User3: I think we should go with option B) No.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

1 year ago

User2: Yeah, it seems like that would just cause more issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

1 year ago

User1: I agree, pausing the wrong node doesn't sound like the right solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keena

1 year ago

I agree with Kanisha, pausing Server1 doesn't guarantee App1 on Server2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Diane

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure that's the right solution. Pausing the Server1 node doesn't seem like it would ensure that App1 continues to run on Server2 when it starts up.

upvoted 0 times