Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-800 Exam - Topic 3 Question 84 Discussion

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.You are planning the deployment of DNS to a new network.You have three internal DNS servers as shown in the following table.The contoso.local zone contains zone delegations for east.conloso.local and west.contoso.local. All the DNS servers use root hints.You need to ensure that all the DNS servers can resolve the names of all the internal namespaces and internet hosts.Solution: On Server2 and Server3, you configure a conditional forwarder for contoso.local.Does this meet the goal?
A) Yes
B) No

Microsoft AZ-800 Exam - Topic 3 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-800 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 3
[All AZ-800 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You are planning the deployment of DNS to a new network.

You have three internal DNS servers as shown in the following table.

The contoso.local zone contains zone delegations for east.conloso.local and west.contoso.local. All the DNS servers use root hints.

You need to ensure that all the DNS servers can resolve the names of all the internal namespaces and internet hosts.

Solution: On Server2 and Server3, you configure a conditional forwarder for contoso.local.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The DNS chapters in Administering Windows Server Hybrid Core Infrastructure describe conditional forwarders as a way to direct queries for specific namespaces to authoritative DNS servers. The text notes: ''A conditional forwarder forwards queries for a designated DNS domain to specified DNS servers,'' which is used to ''integrate split or private namespaces across sites or forests.'' In this design, Server1 hosts contoso.local and delegates east and west to Server2 and Server3. By configuring Server2 and Server3 with a conditional forwarder for contoso.local pointing to Server1, any query for contoso.local (including child names like east.contoso.local or west.contoso.local when not answered locally) is sent to Server1. Server1, being authoritative for the parent, uses the existing delegations to return referrals/answers from the proper child zones. For Internet hosts, all three servers already use root hints, which the course material confirms remains valid alongside conditional forwarding. The documentation also stresses that ''authoritative data is answered locally first; forwarding applies only to names the server is not authoritative for,'' so Server2 continues to answer east locally while leveraging Server1 to reach parent and sibling zones. This configuration ensures that all servers can resolve all internal namespaces and Internet hosts.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Alaine
4 days ago
I agree with A) Yes. Forwarders help with name resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
9 days ago
A) Yes. It allows Server2 and Server3 to resolve internal names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
14 days ago
I feel like it could work, but I'm leaning towards B) No.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
19 days ago
I think the answer is A) Yes. It makes sense to use conditional forwarders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
25 days ago
Sounds good, but what about external resolution?
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
30 days ago
Wait, does that really solve all the issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 month ago
Conditional forwarders are a solid choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
1 month ago
I disagree, it won't cover all namespaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
2 months ago
Yes, that should work!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
2 months ago
I'm not so sure about that...
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
2 months ago
Yes, this should work perfectly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
Wait, can conditional forwarders handle all internal namespaces?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
2 months ago
I don't think that's enough for full resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
2 months ago
That sounds like a solid plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
3 months ago
I feel like this might not meet the goal because the delegation for east.contoso.local and west.contoso.local could complicate things. We might need to consider other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
3 months ago
If I remember correctly, conditional forwarders are typically used for specific domains, but I'm not sure if they would help with resolving all internal namespaces in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
3 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where we had to configure DNS servers, but I can't recall if conditional forwarders were the best solution for internal namespaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure if setting up conditional forwarders on Server2 and Server3 is the right approach. I remember something about root hints being sufficient for resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel