Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 2 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 2

You have an on-premises DNS server named Server1 that hosts a primary DNS zone named fabrikam.com.

You have an Azure subscription that contains the resources shown in the following table.

Users on the on-premises network access resources on all the virtual networks by using a Site-to-Site (S2S) VPN. You need to deploy an Azure DNS Private Resolver solution that meets the following requirements:

* Resources connected to the virtual networks must be able to resolve DNS names for fabrikam.com.

* Server1 must be able to resolve the DNS names of the resources in contoso.com.

* The solution must minimize costs and administrative effort.

What is the minimum number of resolvers you should deploy?

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Elin at Sep 18, 2024, 04:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Paz

6 months ago

Seems like 1 is enough, but I’m curious about the cost implications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deonna

6 months ago

I’m leaning towards 2 just to be safe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billi

7 months ago

Wait, are we sure about that? What if there's a failure?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecilia

7 months ago

Totally agree, 1 should cover it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Laticia

7 months ago

I think you only need 1 resolver for this setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ula

7 months ago

I’m leaning towards one resolver since it seems to meet the requirements, but I’m worried about the redundancy aspect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabrina

8 months ago

I feel like I read that having at least one resolver per virtual network is a good practice, but I can't recall the exact number needed here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bette

8 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to balance cost and functionality. Maybe two resolvers would be safer?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

8 months ago

I remember something about DNS resolvers, but I'm not sure if one would be enough for both zones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kip

8 months ago

This seems straightforward. Based on the information provided, I believe the minimum number of resolvers we should deploy is 2 - one for each of the DNS zones, fabrikam.com and contoso.com.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

8 months ago

I've got a strategy in mind. Since we need to enable DNS resolution in both directions, I think we'll need to deploy at least two resolvers - one for the fabrikam.com zone and one for the contoso.com zone. Let me double-check the requirements to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the Azure DNS Private Resolver solution and how it works. I'll need to review the documentation to understand the different options and how they apply to this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myrtie

8 months ago

Okay, let's break this down step-by-step. We need to enable DNS resolution between the on-premises network and the Azure virtual networks, while minimizing costs and administrative effort. I think I can figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

France

8 months ago

This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and the resources available to determine the minimum number of resolvers needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristal

8 months ago

This looks like a tricky one. I'm not too familiar with the Common Data Service, so I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelaide

2 years ago

I bet the person who wrote this question has a secret love for DNS. The more resolvers, the merrier, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Beckie

2 years ago

C) 3

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

2 years ago

B) 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanda

2 years ago

A) 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

2 years ago

Hold on, are we sure we need more than one resolver? I mean, why make things complicated when one should do the trick? I say A!

upvoted 0 times

Cristina

2 years ago

In this case, the minimum number of resolvers we should deploy is actually 2. So, the correct answer is B) 2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margot

2 years ago

I agree, deploying multiple resolvers would ensure that all the DNS name resolution requirements are met. So, the answer is not A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawn

2 years ago

I think we actually need more than one resolver to meet all the requirements. A single resolver might not be enough.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

2 years ago

I'm not sure, but it makes sense to have separate resolvers for each domain. So, I think the answer is B) 2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

2 years ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Maybe D? Four resolvers just to be safe, you know, better safe than sorry!

upvoted 0 times

Felice

2 years ago

D) 4

upvoted 0 times

...

Luann

2 years ago

C) 3

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

2 years ago

B) 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Kasandra

2 years ago

A) 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Elza

2 years ago

I agree with Kris. Deploying 2 resolvers would meet the requirements and minimize costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mee

2 years ago

Wow, this is a tricky one! I'm going with C. Three resolvers to handle the different requirements.

upvoted 0 times

Maryanne

2 years ago

C) 3

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisandra

2 years ago

B) 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Anthony

2 years ago

A) 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

2 years ago

I think the answer is B) 2 because we need one resolver for fabrikam.com and one for contoso.com.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristin

2 years ago

I think the answer is B. Two resolvers should be deployed, one for each virtual network.

upvoted 0 times

Fannie

2 years ago

Yes, having two resolvers would allow for the necessary DNS resolution without unnecessary duplication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

2 years ago

It makes sense to have one resolver for each virtual network to minimize costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andree

2 years ago

I agree, deploying two resolvers would meet the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvie

2 years ago

I think the answer is B. Two resolvers should be deployed, one for each virtual network.

upvoted 0 times

...