Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 10 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 10
[All AZ-700 Questions]

Your company has five offices. Each office has a firewall device and a local internet connection. The offices connect to a third-party SD-WAN.

You have an Azure subscription that contains a virtual network named Vnet1. Vnet1 contains a virtual network gateway named Gateway1. Each office connects to Gateway1 by using a Site-to-Site VPN connection.

You need to replace the third-party SD-WAN with an Azure Virtual WAN. What should you include in the solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Winfred
4 months ago
Agreed, Gateway1 has to go if we're switching to Azure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
Surprised they didn't mention a Traffic Manager profile! Is that really needed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emelda
5 months ago
P2S connections on firewalls? Seems unnecessary to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
5 months ago
I think enabling active-active mode on Gateway1 could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
5 months ago
You definitely need to delete Gateway1 for the Azure Virtual WAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
5 months ago
I don’t recall much about Traffic Manager in this context; it seems more related to load balancing than connecting offices directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
5 months ago
I feel like enabling active-active mode could help with redundancy, but I’m not entirely confident if that’s the best option for replacing the SD-WAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
5 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to set up connections for multiple offices, but I’m not sure if P2S is the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
5 months ago
I remember something about needing to keep the gateway for VPN connections, so deleting Gateway1 seems wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
5 months ago
D seems like a good option too. Using an Expression inside the widget to refer to the Aggregate data could be a way to bind it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
6 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this. The "Event Additional Information" and "Alert Source" options seem like the most likely places to find details about the event rule that triggered the alert.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different approaches carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel