MENU
You have three on-premises networks.
You have an Azure subscription that contains a Basic Azure virtual WAN. The virtual WAN contains a single virtual hub and a virtual network gateway that is limited to a throughput of 1 Gbps.
The on-premises networks connect to the virtual WAN by using Site-to-Site (S2S) VPN connections.
You need to increase the throughput of the virtual WAN to 3 Gbps. The solution must minimize administrative effort.
What should you do?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium AZ-700 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
CR
Craig
6 months ago
C seems unnecessary. We just need to boost throughput, not create more hubs.
MA
Malcolm
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards B. Adding a VPN gateway could be effective too.
AS
Ashley
7 months ago
True, but D might require more setup. A is simpler.
GL
Glory
7 months ago
But what about D? Increasing scale units could also work.
PE
Pearline
7 months ago
Wait, can you really just upgrade to Standard and get 3 Gbps? Sounds too easy!
AL
Aleisha
7 months ago
D) Increase the number of gateway scale units? Really?
KA
Kanisha
7 months ago
C) Create an additional virtual hub? Seems unnecessary.
TE
Teddy
8 months ago
I think B) Add an additional VPN gateway might be better.
RE
Regenia
8 months ago
Increase the number of gateway scale units? What is this, a video game?
HO
Hortencia
8 months ago
B
TR
Truman
8 months ago
D
SH
Sherman
9 months ago
A
ES
Essie
9 months ago
Increasing the number of gateway scale units seems like a viable option, but I’m not confident if it’s the most efficient way to minimize admin effort.
CR
Cristy
9 months ago
Creating an additional virtual hub sounds like it could help, but I feel like that might complicate things more than necessary.
GR
Gregoria
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but adding an additional VPN gateway could work too. I remember something about scaling options in practice questions.
LO
Loreen
9 months ago
I think upgrading the virtual WAN to the Standard SKU might be the right choice since it directly addresses the throughput limit.
SH
Sherita
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Based on the information provided, upgrading the virtual WAN to the Standard SKU (option A) seems like the most straightforward and least administratively intensive solution to increase the throughput to 3 Gbps. That's the approach I'm going to go with.
NO
Noble
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The question mentions minimizing administrative effort, so I'm not sure if creating an additional virtual hub (option C) would be the best approach. I think I'll need to think this through a bit more.
GE
Genevieve
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option D is the way to go here. Increasing the number of gateway scale units should allow you to increase the throughput without having to do a full upgrade of the virtual WAN. Seems like the most straightforward solution.
KR
Kristal
10 months ago
A) Upgrade the virtual WAN to the Standard SKU is the way to go!
JE
Jesusita
10 months ago
I agree, A makes sense. Less hassle for management.
LE
Lemuel
10 months ago
I think A is the best choice. Upgrading to Standard SKU seems straightforward.
RO
Rodolfo
11 months ago
Upgrading to the Standard SKU is the way to go! Easy peasy.
HE
Herman
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question says the virtual network gateway is limited to 1 Gbps, so I'm not sure if just upgrading the virtual WAN will be enough. Maybe adding an additional VPN gateway (option B) could be a good solution?
AN
Anglea
11 months ago
I think the key here is to increase the throughput of the virtual WAN, and the question mentions that the solution should minimize administrative effort. Based on that, I'm leaning towards option A - upgrading the virtual WAN to the Standard SKU.
DE
Desire
6 months ago
A is definitely the best choice for simplicity.
AL
Alyce
6 months ago
But what about option D? More scale units could help too.
TE
Tegan
6 months ago
Upgrading to Standard SKU makes sense for less hassle.
KA
Kaycee
6 months ago
I agree, option A seems the most straightforward.
WY
Wynell
11 months ago
True, but that might require more management.