Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 1 Question 82 Discussion

Posted by Tammara on Mar 24, 2025 at 05:13 PM

Your on-premises network contains a DNS server named Server 1.

You have an Azure subscription that contains the resources shown in the following table.

The on-premises network is connected to VNet1 by using a Site-to-Site (S2S) VPN.

You need to ensure that Server1 can resolve the DNS name of storage1. The solution must minimize costs and administrative effort.

What should you use?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
RO
Rosio 10 months ago
Public DNS zone won't work for this scenario, right?
DI
Dino 10 months ago
Not so sure about that, a VM might be more flexible.
ME
Mertie 10 months ago
I think an Azure Private DNS zone is the way to go.
JO
Joanna 11 months ago
Definitely agree, it minimizes costs too!
LA
Lamonica 11 months ago
Azure DNS Private Resolver sounds interesting, but is it really necessary?
OT
Otis 11 months ago
I’m not confident about the public DNS zone option; it seems like it wouldn’t fit the requirement of minimizing costs and effort for internal resources.
FR
Francoise 11 months ago
I’m leaning towards the Azure virtual machine option, but I recall it might involve more management overhead than just using a DNS zone.
FL
Fletcher 12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to connect on-prem resources to Azure. I feel like Azure DNS Private Resolver could be a good choice here, but I need to double-check its capabilities.
HE
Henriette 12 months ago
I think using an Azure Private DNS zone makes sense since it can integrate with on-premises DNS, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the most cost-effective option.
YU
Yuette 12 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The Azure Private DNS zone seems like the most suitable solution to meet the requirements while keeping things simple to manage.
NO
Noemi 1 year ago
Azure DNS Private Resolver could also be a good option here, as it allows for flexible DNS resolution between on-premises and Azure resources. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of that approach compared to the Private DNS zone.
AL
Alpha 1 year ago
Based on the requirement to minimize costs and administrative effort, I'm leaning towards using an Azure Private DNS zone. That seems like the most straightforward solution to integrate the on-premises DNS server with the Azure resources.
DA
Dante 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different Azure DNS options presented here. I'll need to review the differences between private and public DNS zones to determine the best fit.
MA
Marget 1 year ago
This looks like a classic DNS resolution question. I think the key is to find the most cost-effective and administratively simple solution to allow Server1 to resolve the DNS name of storage1.
RO
Rodney 2 years ago
I believe Azure DNS Private Resolver might be a good choice as well, it can resolve DNS names for resources in a virtual network.
EL
Elenora 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think an Azure virtual machine that hosts a DNS service could also work.
EL
Elsa 2 years ago
I agree with Rozella, using an Azure Private DNS zone would be the best option.
GE
Gertude 2 years ago
D) Azure DNS Private Resolver is the way to go. I hear it even comes with a complimentary bag of potato chips. Gotta love those cloud services!
KE
Kelvin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
D) Azure DNS Private Resolver
EV
Evangelina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
C) an Azure public DNS zone
PR
Precious 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
B) an Azure virtual machine that hosts a DNS service
RE
Rebeca 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
A) an Azure Private DNS zone
CY
Cyril 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
D) Azure DNS Private Resolver
AD
Adolph 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
C) an Azure public DNS zone
WA
Walton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gertude
B) an Azure virtual machine that hosts a DNS service
DO
Dominga 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gertude
A) an Azure Private DNS zone
DE
Dell 2 years ago
D) Azure DNS Private Resolver is my pick. I mean, who wants to manage a whole extra DNS server on-premises? Not this guy!
VI
Victor 2 years ago
I'm going with D) Azure DNS Private Resolver. It's the only option that specifically mentions 'Private' in the name, so it's probably the best fit for this hybrid setup.
JA
James 2 years ago
D) Azure DNS Private Resolver sounds like the way to go. It's designed for hybrid scenarios like this, and it should minimize administrative overhead.
BU
Buddy 1 year ago
↳ replying to James
C) an Azure public DNS zone
VA
Val 1 year ago
↳ replying to James
B) an Azure virtual machine that hosts a DNS service
MA
Marylin 1 year ago
↳ replying to James
A) an Azure Private DNS zone
RO
Rozella 2 years ago
I think we should use an Azure Private DNS zone.
BR
Brianne 2 years ago
I think the correct answer is D) Azure DNS Private Resolver. It seems like the most cost-effective and low-maintenance solution to enable Server1 to resolve the DNS name of storage1.
SH
Shenika 2 years ago
↳ replying to Brianne
Definitely, Azure DNS Private Resolver is the way to go in this situation.
SH
Shala 2 years ago
↳ replying to Brianne
I think so too. It will minimize costs and administrative effort while allowing Server1 to resolve the DNS name of storage1.
DE
Dean 2 years ago
↳ replying to Brianne
I agree, D) Azure DNS Private Resolver seems like the best option for this scenario.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel