New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 1 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 1
[All AZ-700 Questions]

Your on-premises network contains a DNS server named Server 1.

You have an Azure subscription that contains the resources shown in the following table.

The on-premises network is connected to VNet1 by using a Site-to-Site (S2S) VPN.

You need to ensure that Server1 can resolve the DNS name of storage1. The solution must minimize costs and administrative effort.

What should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Rosio
3 months ago
Public DNS zone won't work for this scenario, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
3 months ago
Not so sure about that, a VM might be more flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
3 months ago
I think an Azure Private DNS zone is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
3 months ago
Definitely agree, it minimizes costs too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
3 months ago
Azure DNS Private Resolver sounds interesting, but is it really necessary?
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
4 months ago
I’m not confident about the public DNS zone option; it seems like it wouldn’t fit the requirement of minimizing costs and effort for internal resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards the Azure virtual machine option, but I recall it might involve more management overhead than just using a DNS zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to connect on-prem resources to Azure. I feel like Azure DNS Private Resolver could be a good choice here, but I need to double-check its capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
4 months ago
I think using an Azure Private DNS zone makes sense since it can integrate with on-premises DNS, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the most cost-effective option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The Azure Private DNS zone seems like the most suitable solution to meet the requirements while keeping things simple to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
5 months ago
Azure DNS Private Resolver could also be a good option here, as it allows for flexible DNS resolution between on-premises and Azure resources. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of that approach compared to the Private DNS zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
5 months ago
Based on the requirement to minimize costs and administrative effort, I'm leaning towards using an Azure Private DNS zone. That seems like the most straightforward solution to integrate the on-premises DNS server with the Azure resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different Azure DNS options presented here. I'll need to review the differences between private and public DNS zones to determine the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
5 months ago
This looks like a classic DNS resolution question. I think the key is to find the most cost-effective and administratively simple solution to allow Server1 to resolve the DNS name of storage1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
11 months ago
I believe Azure DNS Private Resolver might be a good choice as well, it can resolve DNS names for resources in a virtual network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think an Azure virtual machine that hosts a DNS service could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
11 months ago
I agree with Rozella, using an Azure Private DNS zone would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
11 months ago
D) Azure DNS Private Resolver is the way to go. I hear it even comes with a complimentary bag of potato chips. Gotta love those cloud services!
upvoted 0 times
Kelvin
9 months ago
D) Azure DNS Private Resolver
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
9 months ago
C) an Azure public DNS zone
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
10 months ago
B) an Azure virtual machine that hosts a DNS service
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
10 months ago
A) an Azure Private DNS zone
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
10 months ago
D) Azure DNS Private Resolver
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
10 months ago
C) an Azure public DNS zone
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
10 months ago
B) an Azure virtual machine that hosts a DNS service
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
11 months ago
A) an Azure Private DNS zone
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dell
11 months ago
D) Azure DNS Private Resolver is my pick. I mean, who wants to manage a whole extra DNS server on-premises? Not this guy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
11 months ago
I'm going with D) Azure DNS Private Resolver. It's the only option that specifically mentions 'Private' in the name, so it's probably the best fit for this hybrid setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
11 months ago
D) Azure DNS Private Resolver sounds like the way to go. It's designed for hybrid scenarios like this, and it should minimize administrative overhead.
upvoted 0 times
Buddy
10 months ago
C) an Azure public DNS zone
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
10 months ago
B) an Azure virtual machine that hosts a DNS service
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
11 months ago
A) an Azure Private DNS zone
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rozella
12 months ago
I think we should use an Azure Private DNS zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
12 months ago
I think the correct answer is D) Azure DNS Private Resolver. It seems like the most cost-effective and low-maintenance solution to enable Server1 to resolve the DNS name of storage1.
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
11 months ago
Definitely, Azure DNS Private Resolver is the way to go in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
11 months ago
I think so too. It will minimize costs and administrative effort while allowing Server1 to resolve the DNS name of storage1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
11 months ago
I agree, D) Azure DNS Private Resolver seems like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel