Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-400 Topic 5 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-400 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 5
[All AZ-400 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution thatmight meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions willnot appear in the review screen.

Your company uses Azure DevOps to manage the build and release processes for applications.

You use a Git repository for applications source control.

You need to implement a pull request strategy that reduces the historyvolume in the master branch.

Solution: You implement a pull request strategy that uses an explicit merge.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lawrence
8 hours ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about this. Wouldn't an explicit merge lead to a more complex and cluttered commit history? I'd want to explore other options that might be more effective at reducing the history volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
6 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer is A) Yes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
8 days ago
Implementing an explicit merge for the pull request strategy seems like a good way to reduce the history volume in the master branch. I think this solution would meet the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
9 days ago
I agree with Hector, explicit merge can help reduce history volume in the master branch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
12 days ago
I think the solution using an explicit merge will meet the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel