Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-400 Exam - Topic 5 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-400 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 5
[All AZ-400 Questions]

You have an app named App1 that you release by using Azure Pipelines. App1 has the versions shown in the following table.

You complete a code change to fix a bug that was introduced in version 3.4.3.

Which version number should you assign to the release?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Laurel at Feb 08, 2024, 06:10 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Janine
6 months ago
Are we sure about 3.4.4? Seems too simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
6 months ago
Definitely not 4.0.1, that's a major change!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
6 months ago
Wait, why not bump it to 3.5.0?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
7 months ago
I agree, 3.4.4 is the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
7 months ago
Should be 3.4.4 for a bug fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
7 months ago
I thought major changes bump the first number, so 4.0.1 seems way off. I’m leaning towards 3.4.4 as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
7 months ago
I feel like I saw a similar question where we had to decide between minor and patch versions. Is 3.5.0 too much for just a bug fix?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
7 months ago
I remember something about semantic versioning, and since it's just a bug fix, 3.4.4 seems right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
8 months ago
I think we should increment the patch version for a bug fix, so maybe 3.4.4? But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
8 months ago
I agree with Chaya. For a simple bug fix, 3.4.4 is the right choice. Bumping the minor version to 3.5.0 seems overkill in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards 3.5.0 since this is a bug fix that could potentially have some larger impact. Bumping the minor version seems more appropriate than just a patch release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Since the bug was introduced in 3.4.3, the fix should increment the patch version, so the answer is 3.4.4. That makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. If it's just a bug fix, shouldn't the version number be something like 3.4.3.1 or 3.4.3a? I'm not sure how the versioning works in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the version number should be 3.4.4 since it's a bug fix for version 3.4.3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The matrix seems pretty simple, but I want to make sure I understand the potential limitations correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the "no early exit" part. I'll need to re-read the options closely to figure out what that means.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about how content is handled when it's loaded into a region. I'm pretty confident I know the answer, but I'll quickly review the options to make sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
2 years ago
I think 3.4.4 makes sense since it's just a bug fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think version 3.5.0 could also be a valid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
2 years ago
I agree with Alayna, because it's the next logical version number after 3.4.3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
2 years ago
I think we should assign version 3.4.4 to the release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
2 years ago
That's a valid point, Earnestine. It's true that our code change was simply a bug fix, which may align more closely with a patch version increment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
2 years ago
I see your points, but I'm leaning towards B) 3.4.8. I think it strikes a balance between a minor and patch version increment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 3.5.0 because the bug fix represents a significant change warranting a minor version update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) 3.4.4 because it's the next logical version after 3.4.3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. What if the bug fix required more significant changes? In that case, wouldn't it be better to go with a minor version bump, like 3.5.0? That way, we can signal to users that there are more than just a simple patch update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
2 years ago
You know, I was just thinking about how these version numbers remind me of my old high school locker combination. 3.4.3, 3.4.4 - it's like a secret code! *chuckles* Anyway, I also think 3.4.4 is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
2 years ago
I agree with Marlon. Bumping the patch version by 1 is the standard practice when fixing a bug. Going with 3.4.4 seems like the most appropriate version number for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
2 years ago
I think this question is straightforward. Since the bug was introduced in version 3.4.3, the logical choice would be to go with version 3.4.4 for the release. Anything higher than that doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
Noe
2 years ago
D) 4.0.1
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
2 years ago
Exactly, that's the version number you should assign for the release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
2 years ago
A) 3.4.4
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
2 years ago
Not quite, for bug fixes, you typically only increment the last digit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
2 years ago
C) 3.5.0
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
2 years ago
That's correct. You want to increment the last digit to indicate a patch release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
2 years ago
A) 3.4.4
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel