Microsoft AZ-400 Exam - Topic 4 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-400 exam

Question #: 62
Topic #: 4

[All AZ-400 Questions]

Your company uses GitHub for source control. The company has a team that performs code reviews.

You need to automate the assignment of the code reviews. The solution must meet the following requirements:

Prioritize the assignment of code reviews to team members who have the fewest outstanding assignments.

Ensure that each team member performs an equal number of code reviews in any 30-day period.

Prevent the assignment of code reviews to the team leader.

Which two actions should you perform? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

AClear Never assign certain team members.

BSelect If assigning team members, don't notify the entire team.

CSelect Never assign certain team members.

DSet Routing algorithm to Round robin.

ESet Routing algorithm to Load balance.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, E

A: To always skip certain members of the team, select Never assign certain team members. Then, select one or more team members you'd like to always skip. In this case select the team leader.

E: The load balance algorithm chooses reviewers based on each member's total number of recent review requests and considers the number of outstanding reviews for each member. The load balance algorithm tries to ensure that each team member reviews an equal number of pull requests in any 30 day period.

Incorrect Answers:

D: The round robin algorithm chooses reviewers based on who's received the least recent review request, focusing on alternating between all members of the team regardless of the number of outstanding reviews they currently have.

https://docs.github.com/en/organizations/organizing-members-into-teams/managing-code-review-assignment-for-your-team

by Virgina at Aug 01, 2022, 02:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Skye

4 months ago

Wait, can we really automate this? Seems a bit complicated!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alonso

4 months ago

Totally agree with C and D! Makes sense to keep it organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tony

4 months ago

Load balancing (E) could work too, but not sure if it meets all requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

4 months ago

Round robin (D) sounds like a fair way to distribute reviews!

upvoted 0 times

...

Buck

5 months ago

I think option C is a must to keep the team leader out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquita

5 months ago

I vaguely recall something about load balancing in our studies. Option E might be relevant, but I’m leaning towards D for the routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashleigh

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the "never assign" part. Is option A really necessary, or does option C cover that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawn

5 months ago

I think we need to prevent assignments to the team leader, so maybe option C is right for that. But I'm not sure about the routing algorithm.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

5 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question where we had to balance assignments. I feel like option D, Round robin, could help with equal distribution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused about where the data should be pulled from. I'll need to re-read the question and think through the different options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arthur

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident about this one. Saving a modified menu with a new name means the original menu will still exist, so the correct answer is A - there will be two menus.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dawne

5 months ago

RSVP? I'm not sure how that would be used to validate an LSP. That's more for setting up the MPLS tunnels, right? I think I need to review my MPLS concepts a bit more before answering this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know CDS prices are affected by default risk, but I'm not positive if it's the increase or decrease in probability of default that matters. I might have to think this through a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...