Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-400 Exam - Topic 3 Question 96 Discussion

You use Git for source control.You enable GitHub code scanning.You raise a pull request from a non-default branch. In the code scanning output you receive the following error message: "Analysis not found."You need to ensure that the code scanning completes successfully for the pull request.Which two actions should you perform? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
C) Update the code in the pull request. and D) Add the name of the default branch to the on: push specification in the code scanning workflow.
A) Add a new workflow for code scanning.
B) Add the name of the non-default branch to the on: push specification in the code scanning workflow.
E) Delete the pull request, and then raise the request again from the default branch.

Microsoft AZ-400 Exam - Topic 3 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-400 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 3
[All AZ-400 Questions]

You use Git for source control.

You enable GitHub code scanning.

You raise a pull request from a non-default branch. In the code scanning output you receive the following error message: "Analysis not found."

You need to ensure that the code scanning completes successfully for the pull request.

Which two actions should you perform? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

by Nikita at May 08, 2024, 03:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leonardo
8 months ago
I thought code scanning just worked automatically, this is surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
8 months ago
B is crucial, you need to specify the branch for the workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
9 months ago
Wait, why would you delete the pull request? Seems extreme!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
9 months ago
I think C might help too, but not sure if it’s necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
9 months ago
A and B are definitely the right moves!
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
9 months ago
Deleting the pull request seems drastic. I feel like there should be a way to fix the workflow without starting over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to adjust the push specification. I think it was about including the non-default branch, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
10 months ago
I think adding a new workflow could help, but I also feel like it might not be necessary if the existing one just needs a tweak.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
10 months ago
I remember something about needing to specify branches in the workflow, but I'm not sure if it's the non-default or the default branch that needs to be added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
10 months ago
Deleting the pull request and starting over from the default branch seems like a risky move. I'd rather try to fix the existing setup if possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between adding a new workflow and updating the existing one. I'll need to double-check the documentation to make sure I understand the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
10 months ago
I think the key here is to make sure the non-default branch is included in the workflow. Adding that to the on: push specification sounds like a good place to start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
10 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The error message says the analysis wasn't found, so I'm guessing we need to make sure the code scanning is set up properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
10 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the workflow configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
10 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We have Bubba's account details, the Regulation T requirement, and the new securities he wants to buy. I think I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
10 months ago
Stopping all bundles seems risky - I don't think that's a recommended pre-migration step. I'd focus on minimizing active system processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
10 months ago
Always read the time details carefully. 3:00 am start and end means precise scheduling is key. Option B seems clean and simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
10 months ago
I remember discussing how an underlying disk subsystem could cause performance bottlenecks. That seems key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
2 years ago
Good point. So the answer should be A) Add a new workflow for code scanning, and B) Add the name of the non-default branch to the on: push specification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
2 years ago
Exactly. Adding the non-default branch to the on: push specification makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
2 years ago
I don't think it's enough. We might need to add the name of the branch in the existing workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
2 years ago
I agree. I think one action is to update the workflow. Adding a new workflow for code scanning, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
2 years ago
Yeah, the one about the error message 'Analysis not found'? It was tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
2 years ago
Hey, did you see the GitHub code scanning question in the exam?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel