Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-305 Exam - Topic 2 Question 82 Discussion

You have an Azure subscription that contains an Azure App Service app named App1 in a Standard App Service plan. App1 is accessed directly from the internet by using the following URL: https://app1.contoso.com. The Azure region that hosts App1 supports availability zones for App Service apps.You need to recommend a redundancy solution for App1. The solution must meet the following requirements:* Ensure that App1 is available if two availability zones fail.* Minimize administrative effort.* Minimize costs.What should you recommend?
A) Create an App Service Environment v3. Redeploy App1.
B) Scale out the existing App1 App Service instance to three instances.
C) Create a new Premium v3 App Service plan. Redeploy App1.
D) Scale up the existing App Service plan for App1 to the Premium v3 tier.

Microsoft AZ-305 Exam - Topic 2 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 2
[All AZ-305 Questions]

You have an Azure subscription that contains an Azure App Service app named App1 in a Standard App Service plan. App1 is accessed directly from the internet by using the following URL: https://app1.contoso.com. The Azure region that hosts App1 supports availability zones for App Service apps.

You need to recommend a redundancy solution for App1. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* Ensure that App1 is available if two availability zones fail.

* Minimize administrative effort.

* Minimize costs.

What should you recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Tamie at Jul 07, 2025, 12:15 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shoshana
9 months ago
Scaling out is definitely the way to go here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
10 months ago
A new App Service Environment sounds like overkill for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
10 months ago
Wait, can we really ensure availability with just three instances?
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
10 months ago
I disagree, I think D is more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
10 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
10 months ago
Scaling up to Premium v3 sounds like it could help, but I wonder if it really meets the requirement of being available if two zones fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where scaling out was the answer, but I can't recall if it specifically mentioned availability zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
11 months ago
I think creating an App Service Environment v3 might be overkill for minimizing costs, but it could provide the redundancy we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
11 months ago
I remember we discussed redundancy solutions in class, but I'm not sure if scaling out is enough to cover two availability zones failing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
11 months ago
Scaling up to Premium v3 could work, but I'm not sure if that fully meets the redundancy requirement. I'll have to double-check the details on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the App Service Environment v3 option. Does that really minimize administrative effort and cost? I'll need to research that further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
12 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key is ensuring App1 is available even if two availability zones fail. I think scaling out to three instances might be the simplest approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
12 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and weigh the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
1 year ago
I feel like Option B is the way to go. Simple, straightforward, and it'll get the job done. Plus, who doesn't love a good 'scale-out' solution?
upvoted 0 times
Sharita
1 year ago
User1: I think Option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loise
1 year ago
Haha, if only they had an 'Availability Zone Unicorn' plan, that would really minimize the administrative effort. But I guess we have to work with what we've got.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
1 year ago
Hmm, I don't know. Option D might be worth considering - scaling up the existing plan could be a simpler way to get the redundancy we need. Less hassle than a full redeployment.
upvoted 0 times
Denise
1 year ago
But wouldn't creating a new Premium v3 App Service plan also work? It seems like a straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 year ago
Option D sounds like a good idea. It could be easier than redeploying everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marsha
1 year ago
I agree with Timmy. It's the best option to ensure availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
1 year ago
Creating an App Service Environment v3 will provide redundancy across availability zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
1 year ago
Why do you think that, Timmy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Creating a new Premium v3 plan and redeploying App1 might be a bit more work, but it should give us the availability zones we're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
Tesha
1 year ago
I agree, Option C seems like the best way to ensure App1 is available even if two availability zones fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 year ago
Option C sounds like a good choice. It should give us the redundancy we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nan
1 year ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward and cost-effective solution. Scaling out the existing instance should provide the redundancy we need without too much administrative overhead.
upvoted 0 times
Noemi
1 year ago
That sounds like a good plan. It should give us the redundancy we need without breaking the bank.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
1 year ago
B) Scale out the existing App1 App Service instance to three instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Timmy
1 year ago
I think we should go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel