Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AZ-305 Topic 10 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 10
[All AZ-305 Questions]

You need to recommend an App Service architecture that meets the requirements for Appl. The solution must minimize costs.

What should few recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, E

by Leslie at Apr 11, 2024, 03:50 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ashleigh
4 days ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to minimize costs while still meeting the requirements. Let me carefully consider each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
11 days ago
I'm a bit confused about the cash flow patterns. I'll need to carefully analyze the timing of the inflows and outflows to make sure I'm discounting them correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
12 days ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the type of app Mars Inc. is using to build customer loyalty. I'll carefully read through the options and choose the one that best fits the description provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
17 days ago
I'm pretty sure the Cisco WSA supports non-native FTP, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. I guess it depends on the specific requirements and cost constraints. Either way, I'm not gonna be the one to recommend the ASE-per-region option!
upvoted 0 times
Ethan
3 months ago
Yeah, I wouldn't recommend D either. It seems too expensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
3 months ago
C could work too, but B might be the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
4 months ago
I agree, B seems like a good option for minimizing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
4 months ago
I think B is the way to go. It's more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royce
5 months ago
Haha, option D? Really? One ASE per region? That's overkill and probably going to break the bank! I'm sticking with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
5 months ago
C sounds good to me. Consolidating the App Service plans by region should be more cost-effective than creating separate plans for each availability zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
5 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense. Having one App Service plan per availability zone ensures high availability and redundancy, while minimizing costs.
upvoted 0 times
Marla
3 months ago
It's important to minimize costs while still meeting the requirements, so option B is a good recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
4 months ago
Having one App Service plan per availability zone will definitely help with high availability and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
4 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice for meeting the requirements for Appl.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jennifer
6 months ago
That's an interesting point, Helga. Can you explain why you think option A is better in terms of cost and meeting the requirements?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A, one App Service Environment (ASE) per availability zone, is the best choice for meeting the requirements for Appl.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
6 months ago
I think we should go with option C, one App Service plan per region. It will help minimize costs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel