Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-305 Exam - Topic 1 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 1
[All AZ-305 Questions]

Your company plans to publish APIs for its services by using Azure API Management.

You discover that service responses include the AspNet-Version header.

You need to recommend a solution to remove AspNet-Version from the response of the published APIs.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/api-management/transform-api

by Dell at Nov 23, 2025, 12:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Pearlene
2 days ago
I think we should go with option C, a new policy. It’s straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
7 days ago
A new revision? That feels like overkill for just a header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
25 days ago
Definitely C, it's the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
1 month ago
Wait, is the AspNet-Version header really a security risk?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 month ago
I disagree, a new product seems unnecessary for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
1 month ago
C) a new policy is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
2 months ago
Joke's on you, the correct answer is B) a modification to the URL scheme. That'll really throw 'em off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
2 months ago
I'm with Goldie on this one. C) is the way to go. Gotta love those handy-dandy policies in Azure API Management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
2 months ago
Haha, a new product? Really? That's overkill for just removing a header. C) is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
2 months ago
I’m confused about the difference between a new policy and a new revision. Wouldn't both options potentially work for this issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
2 months ago
I feel like we've seen a question like this before, and it was about removing headers through a policy. So, option C seems likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about modifying the response headers directly. Could that relate to a new product or policy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
3 months ago
I think we might need to look at policies in API Management to handle headers. Maybe option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
3 months ago
Definitely going with the policy solution on this one. That seems like the cleanest way to handle this requirement without having to make bigger changes to the API setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
3 months ago
Hmm, a new revision could work, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach. I'd want to look into the policy option a bit more to understand how that would work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
3 months ago
C) a new policy is the way to go. That's the easiest solution to remove the unwanted header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
4 months ago
Yeah, removing headers is a common use case for policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
4 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with D) a new revision. Seems like the best way to update the API without affecting the existing one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is modifying the URL scheme a valid option? I'm not sure how that would help remove the header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
4 months ago
I think the solution here is to use a new policy. That seems like the most straightforward way to remove the header from the response.
upvoted 0 times
Nadine
3 months ago
I agree, a new policy sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel