Microsoft AZ-305 Exam - Topic 1 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam

Question #: 87
Topic #: 1

[All AZ-305 Questions]

Your company plans to publish APIs for its services by using Azure API Management.

You discover that service responses include the AspNet-Version header.

You need to recommend a solution to remove AspNet-Version from the response of the published APIs.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Aa new product

Ba modification to the URL scheme

Ca new policy

Da new revision

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/api-management/transform-api

by Dell at Nov 23, 2025, 12:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Trinidad

5 months ago

Definitely C. Policies are designed for this kind of task.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dottie

5 months ago

I feel like revisions are more complex. Policy is simpler.

upvoted 0 times

...

Natalya

5 months ago

But what about option D? A new revision could work too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eliz

5 months ago

Agreed! A new policy can easily handle header modifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearlene

6 months ago

I think we should go with option C, a new policy. It’s straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaun

6 months ago

A new revision? That feels like overkill for just a header.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

6 months ago

Definitely C, it's the simplest solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Berry

7 months ago

Wait, is the AspNet-Version header really a security risk?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

7 months ago

I disagree, a new product seems unnecessary for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celestina

7 months ago

C) a new policy is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

7 months ago

Joke's on you, the correct answer is B) a modification to the URL scheme. That'll really throw 'em off!

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlene

7 months ago

I'm with Goldie on this one. C) is the way to go. Gotta love those handy-dandy policies in Azure API Management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Haydee

7 months ago

Haha, a new product? Really? That's overkill for just removing a header. C) is the clear winner here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurene

8 months ago

I’m confused about the difference between a new policy and a new revision. Wouldn't both options potentially work for this issue?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

8 months ago

I feel like we've seen a question like this before, and it was about removing headers through a policy. So, option C seems likely.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

8 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about modifying the response headers directly. Could that relate to a new product or policy?

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

8 months ago

I think we might need to look at policies in API Management to handle headers. Maybe option C?

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniel

8 months ago

Definitely going with the policy solution on this one. That seems like the cleanest way to handle this requirement without having to make bigger changes to the API setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

9 months ago

Hmm, a new revision could work, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach. I'd want to look into the policy option a bit more to understand how that would work.

upvoted 0 times

...