Microsoft AZ-204 Exam - Topic 2 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-204 exam

Question #: 103
Topic #: 2

You need to design network connectivity for a subnet in an Azure virtual network. The subnet will contain 30 virtual machines. The virtual machines will establish outbound connections to internet hosts by using the same a pool of four public IP addresses, inbound connections to the virtual machines will be prevented.

What should include in the design?

AAzure Private Link

BNAT Gateway

CUser Defined Routes

DAzure Virtual WAN

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Staci at Sep 19, 2024, 12:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-204 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kina

6 months ago

Azure Private Link isn't necessary here, just stick with NAT.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chi

6 months ago

Wait, can you really use just four public IPs for 30 VMs? Sounds risky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

7 months ago

User Defined Routes could be useful too, but not essential.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

7 months ago

I agree, NAT Gateway is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Julianna

7 months ago

Definitely need a NAT Gateway for that setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

7 months ago

I’m a bit confused about User Defined Routes; I thought they were more for controlling traffic flow rather than managing outbound IPs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Giuseppe

8 months ago

This question reminds me of a practice scenario we did where we had to manage IP addresses for VMs. I feel like NAT Gateway was the right choice there too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janine

8 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about Azure Private Link being more for secure connections to Azure services, not for outbound internet access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marget

8 months ago

I think we need to use a NAT Gateway for the outbound connections since it allows multiple VMs to share a pool of public IPs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maricela

8 months ago

Based on the requirement to use a pool of public IP addresses, I'm leaning towards the NAT Gateway solution. It seems like the most straightforward way to handle the outbound connectivity while preventing inbound connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisbeth

8 months ago

I'm a bit confused on the difference between NAT Gateway and User Defined Routes. I'll need to review the documentation to make sure I understand the pros and cons of each option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Esteban

8 months ago

Okay, let's see. We need to allow outbound connections to the internet using a pool of public IP addresses, while preventing inbound connections. I think NAT Gateway might be the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

8 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully to determine the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronald

8 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is understanding how the universal forwarder and deployment server work together to monitor new files. I'll walk through the scenario step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

1 year ago

You know, if I had a pool of four public IPs, I'd be tempted to use them to become a supervillain. But B) NAT Gateway is the professional choice, I suppose.

upvoted 0 times

Carrol

11 months ago

Exactly, NAT Gateway will provide the necessary network connectivity for the subnet with 30 virtual machines.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oren

11 months ago

Azure Private Link, User Defined Routes, and Azure Virtual WAN are not necessary for this specific design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ira

11 months ago

I agree, using NAT Gateway will allow the virtual machines to establish outbound connections using the pool of public IP addresses.

upvoted 0 times

...

Queen

1 year ago

B) NAT Gateway would be the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hobert

1 year ago

A) Azure Private Link? Nah, that's for private connections, not internet access. B) NAT Gateway is the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

1 year ago

D) Azure Virtual WAN is an interesting option, but it might be overkill for this simple subnet setup. I'd stick with the more straightforward B) NAT Gateway.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shelton

1 year ago

I'm leaning towards C) User Defined Routes. That way, I can control the traffic flow and ensure the VMs only use the public IP pool for outbound connections.

upvoted 0 times

Noemi

12 months ago

User3: What about A) Azure Private Link? Would that be a suitable option for this scenario?

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

12 months ago

User2: I agree, NAT Gateway would provide better control over the traffic flow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

1 year ago

User1: I think B) NAT Gateway would be a better option for controlling outbound connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Man

1 year ago

B) NAT Gateway seems like the right choice here. It allows the VMs to access the internet while keeping inbound connections out.

upvoted 0 times

Emiko

1 year ago

A) Azure Private Link is not necessary in this scenario. NAT Gateway is the best option for this design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

1 year ago

B) NAT Gateway is definitely the way to go. It will allow the VMs to access the internet while blocking inbound connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

1 year ago

I'm not sure about NAT Gateway. I think we should consider Azure Private Link as well. It could provide a secure and private connection to the virtual machines.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristian

1 year ago

I agree with Thora. NAT Gateway is the best option for this scenario. It will provide the necessary network connectivity for the subnet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thora

1 year ago

I think we should go with option B, NAT Gateway. It will allow the virtual machines to establish outbound connections using the pool of public IP addresses.

upvoted 0 times

...