New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam - Topic 4 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-140 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-140 Questions]

You plan to deploy Windows Virtual Desktop to meet the department requirements shown in the following table.

You plan to use Windows Virtual Desktop host pools with load balancing and autoscaling.

You need to recommend a host pool design that meets the requirements. The solution must minimize costs.

What is the minimum number of host pools you should recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-desktop/create-host-pools-azure-marketplace

3 Host Pools - The RemoteApp can be joinned inside the IT Multi-Session desktop or the Engineering. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-desktop/manage-app-groups The default app group created for a new Azure Virtual Desktop host pool also publishes the full desktop. In addition, you can create one or more RemoteApp application groups for the host pool.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Evangelina
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards 2 as a solid compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
3 months ago
3 seems excessive, but I guess it depends on the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
3 months ago
I disagree, 2 might be safer for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure 1 host pool can handle peak times?
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
3 months ago
I think 1 host pool should be enough for cost efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that using multiple host pools can help with scaling, but I’m torn between two or three. I should double-check the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
4 months ago
I feel like the minimum number could be one, but I’m worried that might not meet all the load balancing requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to balance costs and performance. I want to say two host pools might be the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
4 months ago
I remember discussing host pools in class, but I'm not entirely sure how many we need for cost efficiency. Was it one or two?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
4 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to consider factors like the peak concurrent users, the resource requirements, and the potential for load balancing across the host pools. I'm not sure if 1 host pool will be enough, but 4 might be overkill. I'll need to do some calculations to determine the optimal number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the requirements, we need to maximize the utilization of the host pools to minimize costs. I'll likely recommend 2 host pools - one for the 200 users and one for the 100 users, with autoscaling to handle the fluctuating demand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The requirements seem clear, but I'm not sure how to determine the minimum number of host pools needed. I'll need to review the concepts around load balancing and autoscaling in Windows Virtual Desktop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about optimizing the host pool design for Windows Virtual Desktop. I'll need to carefully analyze the requirements and think through the different options to minimize costs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel