Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam - Topic 4 Question 95 Discussion

You have the Azure Virtual Desktop deployment shown in the following table.You plan to deploy a new host pool as shown in the following table.You need to ensure that you can deploy the host pool.What should you do?
D) Submit a support request for service and subscription limits.
A) Add a lock to the existing host pool.
B) Change the proposed virtual machine size for the session hosts to D4s_v3.
C) Stop and deallocate one of the currently deployed virtual machines.

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam - Topic 4 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-140 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-140 Questions]

You have the Azure Virtual Desktop deployment shown in the following table.

You plan to deploy a new host pool as shown in the following table.

You need to ensure that you can deploy the host pool.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Antione at Jun 13, 2025, 11:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-140 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Odette
6 months ago
Definitely submit a support request if you're hitting limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
7 months ago
Stopping a VM could free up resources, sounds reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
7 months ago
I think changing the VM size is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
7 months ago
Wait, can you really just add a lock? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
7 months ago
You need to check the VM limits for the host pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
8 months ago
Adding a lock seems unrelated to deploying a new host pool. I don't think that's the answer, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
8 months ago
I feel like submitting a support request could be an option if we're hitting limits, but I can't recall if that's the best first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
8 months ago
I think we practiced a question where we had to adjust VM sizes to fit within limits. Changing to D4s_v3 might be the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
8 months ago
I remember something about virtual machine limits in Azure, but I'm not sure if we need to stop a VM or just change the size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
9 months ago
I've got this! Based on the information given, I think changing the proposed VM size is the way to go. That should help me deploy the new host pool successfully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
9 months ago
Okay, let me see. The key seems to be ensuring I can deploy the new host pool. I'll consider the options and choose the one that best addresses that requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The details in the tables are important, but I'm not sure which option is the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
9 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'll review the information provided and think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
12 months ago
I'm not sure. Maybe we should also consider submitting a support request for service and subscription limits just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
12 months ago
Haha, I bet the guy who came up with these answer choices was having a real brain fart. Anyway, I'm going with D. Gotta love those support requests!
upvoted 0 times
Denny
11 months ago
I'm not so sure about D. Maybe we should consider the other options first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
11 months ago
I think D is the way to go too. Can't go wrong with a support request.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reyes
12 months ago
I agree with Trinidad. That seems like the best option to ensure we can deploy the host pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
1 year ago
Hold up, what if we just stop and deallocate one of the existing VMs? That would free up resources, right? Not sure if that's the best approach though.
upvoted 0 times
Willodean
11 months ago
C) Stop and deallocate one of the currently deployed virtual machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
11 months ago
B) Change the proposed virtual machine size for the session hosts to D4s_v3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
11 months ago
A) Add a lock to the existing host pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Franchesca
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't changing the virtual machine size to D4s_v3 be a better option? That seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Fletcher
12 months ago
User 3: I agree, changing the virtual machine size might be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
12 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that does seem like a straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
12 months ago
User 1: I think changing the virtual machine size to D4s_v3 is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trinidad
1 year ago
I think we should change the proposed virtual machine size for the session hosts to D4s_v3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
1 year ago
I think the answer is D. You need to submit a support request to increase the service and subscription limits to deploy the new host pool.
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
12 months ago
D) Submit a support request for service and subscription limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
12 months ago
C) Stop and deallocate one of the currently deployed virtual machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
1 year ago
B) Change the proposed virtual machine size for the session hosts to D4s_v3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel