Microsoft AZ-104 Exam - Topic 8 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-104 exam

Question #: 11
Topic #: 8

[All AZ-104 Questions]

You deploy a load balancer that has the following configurations:

* NameLB1

* Type: internal

* SKU: Standard

* Virtual network: VNET1

You need to ensure that you can add VM1 and VM2 to the backend pool of LB1.

Solution: You disassociate the public IP address from the network interface of VM2.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Paz at May 04, 2022, 07:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-104 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Soledad

6 months ago

Agreed, disassociating the public IP is the right move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tasia

6 months ago

Wait, really? I thought any IP would do!

upvoted 0 times

...

Taryn

6 months ago

Definitely a no. Public IPs won't help here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latonia

6 months ago

I think it’s a no. You need a private IP for the internal load balancer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lili

7 months ago

Yes, that should work!

upvoted 0 times

...

Trevor

7 months ago

I’m a bit confused; I thought the public IP was only relevant for external load balancers. Does it really affect internal ones?

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

7 months ago

I’m leaning towards "No" because I believe both VMs need to be in the same virtual network for the backend pool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willetta

7 months ago

I remember a practice question where we had to ensure VMs were in the same subnet as the load balancer. This feels similar, but I'm not sure if the public IP is the main issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marcos

7 months ago

I think disassociating the public IP from VM2 might not be enough since LB1 is internal and needs VMs in the same VNET.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

7 months ago

I think the key here is the need for a dynamic, regularly updated data extension. That rules out a single send journey, so I'm leaning towards one of the automation options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tess

7 months ago

I remember practicing a question about urllib3 recently. If the error mentions that module, then it might be dependencies related to it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

7 months ago

I've got a good feeling about this one. The command that sounds like it would do the job is "dlstat show-aggr". That seems to be the most direct way to get the information we need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

7 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about the licenses part. I'll need to double-check the requirements there.

upvoted 0 times

...