Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AZ-104 Topic 4 Question 117 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-104 exam
Question #: 117
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-104 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an Azure subscription that contains the virtual machines shown in the following table.

You deploy a load balancer that has the following configurations:

* Name: LB1

* Type: Internal

* SKU: Standard

* Virtual network: VNET1

You need to ensure that you can add VM1 and VM2 to the backend pool of LB1.

Solution: You create a Standard SKU public IP address, associate the address to the network interface of VM1, and then stop VM2.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/extensions/dsc-overview

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machine-scale-sets/tutorial-install-apps-template

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/samples/mspnp/samples/azure-well-architected-framework-sample-state-configuration

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/automation-configuration


by Lenna at Mar 20, 2025, 08:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-104 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Krissy
13 days ago
Stop VM2? What is this, a hostage situation? Let's just add both VMs and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
15 days ago
Ugh, these Azure questions can be so confusing sometimes. I'm just going to go with 'No' and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
16 days ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question was trying to trick us. 'Unique solution' my foot, this is clearly not the way to go about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
27 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure creating a public IP address for an internal load balancer is the correct solution. Isn't that kind of defeating the purpose of an internal load balancer?
upvoted 0 times
Dulce
1 days ago
I agree, creating a public IP for an internal load balancer doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
3 days ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
20 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benton
2 months ago
Wait, why do we need to stop VM2? That doesn't seem like the right approach. Shouldn't we just be able to add both VMs to the backend pool?
upvoted 0 times
Glenna
24 days ago
Agreed, we can simply add both VMs to the backend pool without the need to stop VM2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
1 months ago
Stopping VM2 is not necessary. We should be able to add both VMs to the backend pool without stopping any of them.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
An
2 months ago
I'm not sure. Let's think about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
2 months ago
But does associating the address to the network interface of VM1 and stopping VM2 really add both VMs to the backend pool of LB1?
upvoted 0 times
...
An
2 months ago
I think the solution is to create a Standard SKU public IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel