Microsoft AZ-104 Exam - Topic 18 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-104 exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 18

[All AZ-104 Questions]

Your company has a Microsoft Azure subscription.

The company has datacenters in Los Angeles and New York.

You are configuring the two datacenters as geo-clustered sites for site resiliency.

You need to recommend an Azure storage redundancy option.

You have the following data storage requirements:

Data must be stored on multiple nodes.

Data must be stored on nodes in separate geographic locations.

Data can be read from the secondary location as well as from the primary location

Which of the following Azure stored redundancy options should you recommend?

AGeo-redundant storage

BRead-only geo-redundant storage

CZone-redundant storage

DLocally redundant storage

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

RA-GRS allows you to have higher read availability for your storage account by providing ''read only'' access to the data replicated to the secondary location. Once you enable this feature, the secondary location may be used to achieve higher availability in the event the data is not available in the primary region. This is an ''opt-in'' feature which requires the storage account be geo-replicated.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/common/storage-redundancy

by Abel at May 06, 2022, 07:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-104 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Devorah

4 months ago

Wait, can you really read from the secondary location? That's cool!

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

4 months ago

Locally redundant storage? No way, that won't cut it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

4 months ago

Zone-redundant storage? Not sure that fits the geo requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrina

5 months ago

I think read-only geo-redundant storage could work too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

5 months ago

Geo-redundant storage is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizbeth

5 months ago

Locally redundant storage definitely doesn't work because it doesn't provide the multi-region support we need for resiliency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

5 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like zone-redundant storage wouldn't meet the geographic separation requirement we have here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shalon

5 months ago

I think read-only geo-redundant storage might be the right choice since it allows reads from the secondary location, but I need to double-check the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

5 months ago

I remember studying about geo-redundant storage, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best fit for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francine

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different purchasing options and how they would impact the cost-effectiveness. I'll need to review the details carefully to make the best decision.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

5 months ago

I'm not sure about this one, but I'll give it my best shot and hope for the best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brigette

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think I'll go with option A and compare the loss performance on a held-out dataset.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

5 months ago

I've got this! Campus entrance, campus open area, and building entrance - those are the three typical campus scenarios they're looking for. Easy peasy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucille

5 months ago

Alright, I've got a plan. I'm going to focus on extracting the agnostic logic into separate services, and then use the Orchestration and State Repository patterns to improve the performance. I think option C is the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...