Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-104 Exam - Topic 16 Question 21 Discussion

Posted by Frederica on May 07, 2022 at 05:56 PM

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

Your company registers a domain name of contoso.com.

You create an Azure DNS zone named contoso.com, and then you add an A record to the zone for a host named www that has an IP address of 131.107.1.10.

You need to resolve the name resolution issue.

Solution: You modify the SOA record in the contoso.com zone.

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium AZ-104 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
JU
Jutta 12 months ago
Yeah, definitely need to look at the NS record instead.
CA
Carey 1 year ago
Just a heads up, the SOA record is about zone management, not resolution.
ST
Staci 1 year ago
Wait, does changing the SOA really help with name resolution?
JU
Juliann 1 year ago
Totally agree, modifying the NS record makes more sense here!
JO
Josephine 1 year ago
SOA records are mainly for zone info, not for resolving names.
TA
Tabetha 1 year ago
I thought the SOA record was important for zone transfers, but I can't recall if it directly impacts name resolution. This one's tricky!
RO
Roxanne 1 year ago
I have a vague memory that the SOA record is more about zone management than resolving names. Maybe we should focus on the A record or NS record instead?
RO
Robt 1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where modifying the NS record was the correct approach. I feel like that's what we should do here too.
FL
Floyd 1 year ago
I remember studying the SOA record, but I'm not sure if modifying it would actually resolve the name resolution issue.
BE
Ben 1 year ago
Okay, let me see here. Undeploying the service instances could potentially remove the configuration from the network device, NSO, or both. I'll need to analyze the options closely.
AY
Ayesha 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between these configuration management activities. I'll need to think through each one carefully.
LA
Lajuana 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question and the options. Can someone help me understand the difference between "auditconfig set policy=argv" and "auditconfig -setpolicy +argv"? I want to make sure I select the right answer.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel