Microsoft AZ-104 Exam - Topic 16 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-104 exam

Question #: 21
Topic #: 16

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

Your company registers a domain name of contoso.com.

You create an Azure DNS zone named contoso.com, and then you add an A record to the zone for a host named www that has an IP address of 131.107.1.10.

You need to resolve the name resolution issue.

Solution: You modify the SOA record in the contoso.com zone.

AYes

BNo
Modify the NS record, not the SOA record.
Note: The SOA record stores information about the name of the server that supplied the data for the zone; the administrator of the zone; the current version of the data file; the number of seconds a secondary name server should wait before checking for updates; the number of seconds a secondary name server should wait before retrying a failed zone transfer; the maximum number of seconds that a secondary name server can use data before it must either be refreshed or expire; and a default number of seconds for the time-to live file on resource records.
References:
https://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/definition/start-of-authority-record

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Frederica at May 07, 2022, 05:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-104 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jutta

4 months ago

Yeah, definitely need to look at the NS record instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

4 months ago

Just a heads up, the SOA record is about zone management, not resolution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Staci

4 months ago

Wait, does changing the SOA really help with name resolution?

upvoted 0 times

...

Juliann

5 months ago

Totally agree, modifying the NS record makes more sense here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Josephine

5 months ago

SOA records are mainly for zone info, not for resolving names.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tabetha

5 months ago

I thought the SOA record was important for zone transfers, but I can't recall if it directly impacts name resolution. This one's tricky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxanne

5 months ago

I have a vague memory that the SOA record is more about zone management than resolving names. Maybe we should focus on the A record or NS record instead?

upvoted 0 times

...

Robt

5 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where modifying the NS record was the correct approach. I feel like that's what we should do here too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Floyd

5 months ago

I remember studying the SOA record, but I'm not sure if modifying it would actually resolve the name resolution issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ben

5 months ago

Okay, let me see here. Undeploying the service instances could potentially remove the configuration from the network device, NSO, or both. I'll need to analyze the options closely.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ayesha

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between these configuration management activities. I'll need to think through each one carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lajuana

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question and the options. Can someone help me understand the difference between "auditconfig set policy=argv" and "auditconfig -setpolicy +argv"? I want to make sure I select the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...