Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AI-102 Exam - Topic 8 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AI-102 exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 8
[All AI-102 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You are building a chatbot that will use question answering in Azure Cognitive Service for Language.

You have a PDF named Doc1.pdf that contains a product catalogue and a price list

You upload Doc1.pdf and train the model.

During testing, users report that the chatbot responds correctly to the following question: What is the price of ?

The chatbot fails to respond to the following question: How much does < product > cost?

You need to ensure that the chatbot responds correctly to both questions.

Solution: From Language Studio, you add alternative phrasing to the question and answer pair, and then retrain and republish the model.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Leonida
4 months ago
Just adding phrasing might not be enough, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
4 months ago
I think it should work, but I’m not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
4 months ago
Wait, can it really handle both questions after that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
4 months ago
Definitely agree, alternative phrasing is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
5 months ago
Sounds like a solid plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
5 months ago
I think this solution could work, but I wonder if there are other factors affecting the chatbot's performance that we haven't considered yet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
5 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to adjust the training data to cover different ways users might ask the same question. It feels similar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure if just adding alternative phrasing is enough. We might need to check if the model is trained on synonyms too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how adding alternative phrasing can help improve the chatbot's understanding. This seems like a valid approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not fully convinced that this is the complete solution. While adding alternative phrasing is a good start, there might be other factors to consider, like the quality of the PDF data or the way the chatbot is processing the information. I'd want to dig a bit deeper before selecting the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward solution to me. Retraining the model with additional question and answer pairs should help the chatbot understand different ways of asking about product prices. I'd give this a try and see if it resolves the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if adding alternative phrasing is the only thing needed to solve this issue. Shouldn't we also consider how the data is structured in the PDF and whether the chatbot is properly extracting the relevant information?
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
6 months ago
I think the solution provided makes sense. Adding alternative phrasing to the question and answer pair seems like a good way to ensure the chatbot can handle different ways of asking about the product price.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to look for any mismatches or imbalances between the two frames that would need to be addressed. Let me walk through the details step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure on this one. I know search peers are involved in the search process, but I'm not sure if they're the ones that actually return the results. Maybe it's a combination of search heads and search peers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this one. The key is to identify the option that provides the best separation of duties and oversight. Having the payroll bank account reconciled in the payroll department doesn't really address that. And putting the payroll checks under the personal control of the manager is just asking for trouble. I'm pretty sure the right answer is option D - having a person other than the one who requested and authorized the payments prepare the payroll checks. That way, you've got an independent party double-checking the work. Feels like the strongest internal control to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
2 years ago
I'm going with A too. It aligns with best practices I've read about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
2 years ago
But what if just retraining isn't enough? I'm leaning towards A though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
2 years ago
Agreed. Adding different phrasings and retraining seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 years ago
I think the answer is A. Adding alternatives should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
2 years ago
Yeah, it's about training a chatbot in Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
2 years ago
This question seems a bit tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel