Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AB-900 Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

Posted by Myra on Apr 12, 2026 at 11:27 AM

Your company requires that all Microsoft SharePoint sites have a minimum of two owners.

You need to ensure that sites that have less than two owners are marked as read-only if the sites are NOT remediated.

What should you configure in the SharePoint admin center?

Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is C. Site lifecycle management. In the SharePoint admin center, Microsoft includes a Site ownership policy under Site lifecycle management that can identify sites with too few owners and drive remediation. Microsoft documents that this policy can detect sites with fewer than the required number of owners, notify site owners, and if the issue is not fixed, enforce an action such as making the site read-only. That directly matches the requirement that sites with fewer than two owners be marked as read-only when they are not remediated.

The other options do not fit this scenario. Site-level access restriction is about controlling who can access a site, not enforcing ownership-count governance. Data access governance reports help identify oversharing and permissions exposure, but they do not enforce a minimum-owner remediation policy that makes sites read-only. Block download policy for SharePoint and OneDrive is used to restrict downloading from unmanaged devices or similar access scenarios, not to handle insufficient site ownership. Therefore, the Microsoft-documented feature to configure is Site lifecycle management.


Get Premium AB-900 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
PA
Patti 1 month ago
Agreed, we need to manage site ownership effectively.
JO
Josefa 2 months ago
I feel like C covers the requirement best.
AL
Almeta 2 months ago
But what about A? Access restrictions could help too.
ST
Stephane 2 months ago
C seems right. Lifecycle management is key.
MA
Maybelle 2 months ago
I think it's about site management.
RO
Rory 2 months ago
This question is tricky.
CL
Clement 3 months ago
C is the best choice for compliance.
JU
Junita 3 months ago
A could work too, but not as effective.
LY
Lynette 3 months ago
I agree, it helps track ownership.
LO
Lonna 3 months ago
C seems right. Site lifecycle management makes sense.
GR
Grover 3 months ago
I think it's about site management.
DE
Desire 3 months ago
This question is tricky.
JU
Judy 4 months ago
Not sure if C is the best choice. What about B for tracking?
LU
Lucina 4 months ago
Agreed with C! It’s all about managing site ownership properly.
TY
Tyra 4 months ago
Wait, are we really blocking sites just for having one owner? Seems harsh!
BU
Buddy 5 months ago
I think A) Site-level access restriction could work too.
GE
Gertude 6 months ago
Definitely C) Site lifecycle management. That's the way to go!
HO
Hobert 6 months ago
I thought the block download policy was more about file access rather than site ownership. I’m leaning towards site lifecycle management for this one.
TR
Tracey 6 months ago
This feels similar to a practice question we did on site permissions. I think site-level access restriction might be the right choice, but I'm not confident.
TE
Teddy 6 months ago
I remember something about site lifecycle management being important for governance, but I can't recall if it specifically addresses owner requirements.
ES
Esteban 7 months ago
I think this question is about managing site ownership, but I'm not entirely sure which option directly relates to marking sites as read-only.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel