McAfee CCII Exam - Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for McAfee's CCII exam

Question #: 5
Topic #: 1

Computer-generated evidence is always suspect because of the ease with which it can be altered, usually without a trace.

ATrue

BFalse

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Computer-generated evidence must bevalidatedbefore being used in court. Forensic experts employ:

Hashing techniques-- MD5, SHA-256 for data integrity.

Digital signatures and timestamps-- Ensuring authenticity.

Audit trails and access logs-- Tracking modifications.

Without proper validation,altered evidencecan mislead investigations.

McAfee Institute Cyber Evidence Authentication Guide

DOJ Cybercrime Evidence Validation Protocols

Federal Digital Forensic Examination Manual

by Iluminada at Mar 22, 2025, 10:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCII Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ruby

9 months ago

Sounds a bit extreme, isn't there some reliable tech out there?

upvoted 0 times

...

Xenia

9 months ago

True, especially with today's software.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

9 months ago

Totally agree, digital evidence can be manipulated easily.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentin

9 months ago

Wait, are we saying all computer evidence is bad?

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolando

10 months ago

I don't know, some evidence is pretty solid.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leontine

10 months ago

I recall a practice question that emphasized the importance of context in evaluating evidence, which makes me question if it's always suspect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quinn

10 months ago

I feel like this statement is a bit extreme. There are methods to verify digital evidence, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dianne

10 months ago

I think we went over a case study where computer-generated evidence was actually reliable, so I might lean towards false.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annett

11 months ago

I remember discussing how digital evidence can be manipulated, but I'm not sure if it's always suspect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shelia

11 months ago

This is an interesting question. I think I'll need to draw on my understanding of digital forensics and the potential for manipulation to decide the best answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizbeth

11 months ago

I'm a little confused by this question. Is there ever a case where computer-generated evidence could be considered reliable? I'll have to think this through.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodolfo

11 months ago

I've got a good feeling about this one. The statement seems pretty clear that computer-generated evidence is always suspect, so I'll go with True.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamar

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of computer-generated evidence and whether it can truly be considered reliable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

11 months ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the ease of altering computer-generated evidence and whether that makes it always suspect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joana

1 year ago

I think it's false because there are tools and techniques to detect alterations in computer-generated evidence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jannette

1 year ago

I believe it's true that computer-generated evidence is suspect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elena

1 year ago

I disagree, there are ways to verify the authenticity of computer-generated evidence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

1 year ago

True, I've seen enough crime shows to know that digital evidence is as reliable as a politician's promise. Can't trust anything these days!

upvoted 0 times

Reuben

1 year ago

A) True

upvoted 0 times

...

Weldon

1 year ago

True, I've seen enough crime shows to know that digital evidence is as reliable as a politician's promise. Can't trust anything these days!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tom

1 year ago

B) False

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitley

1 year ago

A) True

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

1 year ago

A) True

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

1 year ago

True, I've seen enough crime shows to know that digital evidence is as reliable as a politician's promise. Can't trust anything these days!

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamela

1 year ago

B) False

upvoted 0 times

...

Marguerita

1 year ago

A) True

upvoted 0 times

...

Casey

1 year ago

Haha, this question is as outdated as a floppy disk. Next they'll be asking about the trustworthiness of carrier pigeons as evidence. Times have changed, folks!

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefan

1 year ago

True, absolutely. My grandma could forge a better digital signature than this 'evidence' they're trying to pass off. No way I'm falling for that!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

1 year ago

False, technology has advanced so much that digital forensics can detect even the slightest alteration. You can't fool me with your 'altered without a trace' nonsense!

upvoted 0 times

Amina

1 year ago

False, technology has advanced so much that digital forensics can detect even the slightest alteration. You can't fool me with your 'altered without a trace' nonsense!

upvoted 0 times

...