Haha, I bet the folks who wrote this question were just trying to trip us up with those other options. A, C, and E are clearly the way to go. Who would ever want to deploy a .exe file through a continuous delivery pipeline?
This is a tricky one, but I think A, D, and E are the right answers. Compiled packages can definitely be part of the delivery process, even if they're not the final artifacts.
I agree with A, C, and E. Putting source code in the pipeline would be way too much data to handle. Plus, the pipeline should be about delivering artifacts, not the raw source code.
A, C, and E seem like the obvious choices here. I can't imagine trying to deploy executable files or package manager files through a continuous delivery pipeline.
Vallie
1 months agoVirgina
5 days agoElroy
1 months agoPolly
2 months agoSusana
27 days agoJohnna
1 months agoAlica
1 months agoDominic
2 months agoBev
2 months agoLottie
2 months agoLeana
2 months ago